Quinn Emanuel Courts #MeToo Victims, Shareholders With New Practice Group
John Quinn says no other major Am Law 100 firm has embraced plaintiffs-side litigation related to sexual harassment and discrimination.
September 23, 2019 at 03:10 PM
4 minute read
In the nearly two years since the emergence of the #MeToo movement, plenty of law firms have touted their expertise handling workplace harassment matters, internal investigations and other related practices.
But according to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, no leading Big Law firm has launched a plaintiffs-side practice to pursue sexual harassment and employment discrimination cases—until now.
The 830-lawyer litigation firm on Monday announced the formation of its sexual harassment and employment discrimination practice group, to be co-chaired by New York-based ex- prosecutor Manisha Sheth and longtime Los Angeles commercial litigation partner Diane Cafferata.
"Quinn Emanuel's entry into this practice area is a watershed event," Quinn Emanuel founder and managing partner John Quinn said in a statement. "We are the only major Am Law 100 firm that is actively promoting these plaintiff-side representations."
Sheth made partner at Quinn Emanuel in 2010 and was part of the team that led the firm's $20 billion litigation campaign against big banks that sold mortgage-backed securities to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. She rejoined Quinn Emanuel in March after two years heading up the economic justice division of the New York Attorney General's Office. She rejoined as co-chair of the firm's government and regulatory litigation practice group.
She said Quinn Emanuel can offer sexual harassment plaintiffs a mix of skills and resources that will set the new practice apart.
"What we bring is the credible trial threat and brand recognition," Sheth said. "This will allow for the plaintiff to get a settlement more quickly and get not just compensation relief, but also relief in the form of changes to policies and procedures."
Sheth said that discussions about launching the group began in earnest in August, and after "homework was done" the firm made the move to actively promote the practice.
"As a result of #MeToo, we as a society are at an inflection point," she said. "It is clear that this is not isolated. It [harassment] exists in every industry and at every level of a company. The other thing that is clear is that we as a society are not going to stand for it."
Quinn Emanuel isn't just planning on representing plaintiffs who claim to be direct victims of harassment or assault. In announcing the new practice, the firm noted that it's also well-positioned to bring indirect claims in the form of shareholder derivative suits or even securities fraud claims.
"Courts have seen a dramatic upswing in the number of shareholder derivative suits brought against a company's board of directors based on its failure to act after learning about complaints of sexual harassment made by an employee," the firm said in a release. "Shareholders have also brought securities fraud claims against a company based on allegations that the company made material misstatements or omissions regarding sexual harassment that affected its stock price."
Sheth said that the firm's past experience defending clients against sexual misconduct claims would not cause any conflicts, but rather serve as as asset to plaintiffs.
"There are no positional conflicts that I can see," Sheth said regarding others in the firm representing accused harassers. "I truly believe that if we can convey that this is an advantage we can be better advocates for the client."
John Quinn echoed that sentiment in a statement: "As with our other practice areas, our defense side representations will allow us to anticipate arguments, defenses, and strategies that may be employed by defendants in these types of cases."
Sheth said that one of the main challenges facing the practice is also one of the #MeToo movement's defining characteristics: The need to overcome fear.
"There is a sensitive emotional aspect to this practice," Sheth said. "It takes a lot to come forward. And in litigation there will be discovery, and there are reputational issues at stake. It takes a lot of courage."
Read More
Quinn Emanuel Defends Judge Alex Kozinski as Misconduct Claims Mount
Head of NY AG Economic Justice Division to Depart for Quinn Emanuel
Amid Weinstein Scandal, Employment Attorneys See Business Gains
As #MeToo Roils Clients, Stroock Launches Unit to Vet Sex Claims
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250