Jones Day: Parental Leave Lawsuit by Married Ex-Associates 'Meritless'
In a motion to dismiss, the firm said its policies are legal and it fired one of the plaintiffs for "poor judgment and immaturity," not out of bias.
September 27, 2019 at 06:53 PM
3 minute read
Jones Day on Friday shot back at allegations that it discriminates against men, arguing that its parental leave policies for birth parents and adoptive parents are "sex-neutral in every respect."
In a 37-page motion to dismiss filed Friday in D.C. federal court, attorneys for Jones Day said the claims raised by Mark Savignac and Julia Sheketoff, a married couple who worked at the firm as associates, are "legally meritless."
"The only disparate treatment here is between primary and secondary caregivers—regardless of gender. That does not (and is not alleged to) violate the law," Jones Day's lawyers wrote.
Savignac and Sheketoff alleged the firm's leave policy—in which birth mothers are offered eight weeks of paid disability leave—is discriminatory. But that's because "fathers are not similarly situated to postpartum mothers," the firm argued.
"If a father suffered a heart attack while in the delivery room, he too would be entitled to disability leave," Jones Day continued.
Savignac and Sheketoff complained to the firm about its parental leave policies in 2018 before their son was born. Sheketoff left Jones Day in August 2018. Savignac, described by Jones Day in its filing as a "supposedly sophisticated attorney," was fired five months later, after he sent another email demanding 18 weeks of paid leave or else he would sue and fight the issue both in court and the "court of public opinion."
Jones Day in its motion described Savignac's email as a threat and thus grounds for termination. It was not, the firm's attorneys argued, a "protected activity" because his complaints were not about unlawful activity or discrimination.
"Actually, Jones Day fired him for the poor judgment and immaturity reflected by his extortionate threat to harm the firm in the 'court of public opinion' unless it acceded to his unreasoned demand for the same disability leave afforded to women who give birth," the firm's lawyers wrote.
Jones Day denied the other claims raised by the couple, who met when clerking for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The firm described the two as "undoubtedly, clever and creative lawyers with aspirational views of the law," and suggested that the best way they can achieve their goals for parental leave is to pursue legislative action.
The lawsuit from Savignac and Sheketoff comes as Jones Day fights off a proposed $200 million class action that was filed by former associates who allege that the firm systemically discriminates against women lawyers.
Savignac and Sheketoff are representing themselves in the case. Savignac did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.
Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250