LeClairRyan, Lender Reach Deal on Firm's Liquidation
A federal bankruptcy judge signed off on an agreement to convert the bankruptcy next Friday, over the objections of the acting U.S. trustee.
September 27, 2019 at 02:36 PM
2 minute read
Defunct law firm LeClairRyan has worked out an agreement with its primary lender to put its bankruptcy in the hands of a court-appointed liquidator.
At a Thursday hearing in Richmond, Virginia, U.S. Bankruptcy judge Kevin R. Huennekens of the Eastern District of Virginia signed off on the arrangement to move the matter from Chapter 11 into Chapter 7 at noon Oct. 4, over the opposition of the acting U.S. trustee for the region.
The agreement gives LeClairRyan another week to use cash on hand to support its unwinding, during which it will specifically focus on handling client files that it still retains, either by returning them to clients or disposing of them.
The judge also signed off on the budget for the firm's final week in Chapter 11, after which a liquidating trustee will take over the matter.
U.S. Trustee John Fitzgerald III, the acting trustee for Virginia, the District of Columbia and three other southeastern states, made the initial motion to move the bankruptcy into Chapter 7. He later received support from the firm's primary lender, ABL Alliance LLLP, which was owed $6.8 million out of a $15 million loan at the start of the bankruptcy.
While ABL was willing to work out an arrangement to delay the conversion, the U.S. trustee insisted on an immediate conversion, but lost that fight in court. The assistant U.S. trustee, who argued the matter Thursday, did not respond to a request for comment.
Attorneys for both LeClairRyan and ABL declined to speak on the record. LeClairRyan is being represented by attorneys from Hunton Andrews Kurth, while ABL is being represented by a team from McGuireWoods.
The firm's other secured creditor—ULX Partners. the joint venture the firm launched with UnitedLex to handle support services—did not weigh in on the conversion battle.
LeClairRyan's largest unsecured creditors, meanwhile, include a mix of landlords and service providers.
|Read More
LeClairRyan Bankruptcy Could Keep Creditors, Partners Busy for Years
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCovington, Steptoe Form New Groups Amid Demand in Regulatory, Enforcement Space
4 minute readConsumer Finance Law Enforcer Takes Private Practice Job at Morgan Lewis
With 'Fractional' C-Suite Advisers, Midsize Firms Balance Expertise With Expense
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250