Burford, Quinn Emanuel Make Case for Manipulation in Litigation Funder's Stock Plunge
The third-party litigation funder and its lawyers want a U.K. judge to force the London Stock Exchange to reveal who was behind allegedly suspicious trades.
September 30, 2019 at 05:09 PM
3 minute read
After hiring a Columbia University law professor to probe the precipitous stock drop that came when short seller Muddy Waters released a scathing report on its accounting practices, Burford Capital has asked a London court for judicial approval to obtain details from the London Stock Exchange about who was behind suspicious trading.
Burford first lodged allegations of market manipulation and indicated it had engaged Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Morrison & Foerster and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer on Aug. 12, less than a week after short seller Muddy Waters said in a report that Burford was "a perfect storm for an accounting fiasco."
More than $1.2 billion was subsequently wiped from Burford's value, with shares dropping 64% at one point before rallying later in the afternoon.
In a filing Monday in the U.K.'s High Court, Quinn Emanuel London senior partner Richard East contended that an analysis from Columbia professor Joshua Mitts made clear that the plunge in value resulted from deliberate manipulation.
"The dramatic fall in Burford's share price over the Relevant Period did not merely reflect genuine market concerns that the shares had previously been overvalued, but was caused or substantially contributed to by an unlawful attack by market manipulators, apparently acting in concert with a short selling attack by Muddy Waters over the same period," East said.
Mitts concluded in his 39-page expert report that in the two days following the Muddy Waters' report, Burford's stock on London's AIM exchange was subject to an abnormally high number of sell-side order cancellations. These cancellations of proposed trades, according to Mitts, are components of "spoofing" and "layering," two techniques that send false pricing signals to the market and are prohibited by English and EU law.
Burford said that these findings are sufficient to obligate the London Stock Exchange to turn over details on who was behind these trades, so that it can seek redress on the individuals who were responsible for wiping the value off the company's stock.
"Burford is recycling this spoofing and layering quasi-allegation to distract attention from the real issues of its manipulation of financials, decrepit governance, and questions it refuses to answer," Muddy Waters founder Carson Block said in a statement Monday. "Spoofing and layering are issues that have arisen in the high frequency and computer-driven trading world, and Muddy Waters has zero capability to engage in these practices."
|Read More
'Revenge Porn' Probe, New Investment Report Keep Burford in the Spotlight
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAbout to Become a Partner? Here's What to Know About Your Newfound Wealth
10 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Chief Business Development and Marketing Officer From EY
2 minute readGibson Dunn Lands EY GC for New Practice Advising Accounting Firms
Bonuses and Beyond: Law Firms Wrap Up Lucrative Year With Record-High Rewards
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250