Q&A: How Covington & Burling's Pipeline Fueled a Diverse New Partner Class
The firm feels it has succeeded in an area where many others find frustrating outcomes.
October 02, 2019 at 05:28 PM
7 minute read
Achieving consistently diverse partner classes that reflect the actual makeup of law school graduating classes has long been a point of frustration for many Big Law firms. Washington, D.C.-founded Am Law 50 firm Covington & Burling, with its most recent partner class, seems to have found a way.
The firm announced it has promoted 14 attorneys to partner. Nine of those are women and six come from ethnically diverse backgrounds.
Even though women have for decades kept pace with men in law school graduating classes, they still only make up 21% of law firm equity partners, according to 2019 data provided by the National Association for Law Placement and the Minority Corporate Counsel Association.
Ethnic minorities fare worse, comprising 33% of law school graduating classes but only 9% of equity partnerships, according to NALP and MCCA. And finally, LGBTQ individuals make up 6% of reported graduates and only 2% of equity partners.
Firms have made investments in programs like the Move the Needle Fund and Diversity Lab to help tackle these issues, but most are not finding consistent results in line with what their clients are demanding. Timothy Hester, chairman of Covington's management committee, sat down with The American Lawyer to discuss the process, actions and strategy that allowed the firm to feel as though it can consistently churn out diverse partner classes year after year.
Is this one of the more diverse classes Covington has had come through? The most?
This is the most diverse class we have ever had, and I would expect it is one of the most diverse classes any firm in the country has had when they have promoted a large class like this. It's a real milestone and something we are really proud of.
Can you walk us through the process of getting to the point of promoting your most diverse class ever?
One of the reasons I think it useful to pause, celebrate and take account of this a little bit is it reflects a lot of work over a lot of years to get to this point. This group is the manifestation of a very strong pipeline of women and diverse lawyers that we have been building for well over a decade.
We have been focused not only on recruiting—obviously you start there—but really focused on making sure that our pipeline is robust and that we are creating good opportunities for our women and diverse lawyers to flourish.
I see this not as something that happened in a vacuum at a point in time but really as a reflection and a manifestation of something that happened over years with us.
More specifically than that, I'd point to efforts we have made over many years looking at our second-, third-, fourth-year classes and studying how our women and diverse lawyers are slotting into roles in the practice and making sure that different practices are thinking hard about creating opportunity for women and diverse lawyers in those practices.
There was a pretty systematic effort that we made. We made some changes in our policies to make sure that we were fully supportive. We then had a pretty careful, systematic year-over-year review of where we were in different parts of our practice. We were looking at who was coming along in the pipeline in different practices, how were they slotting in, what kind of work were they being given. It was a study over years. I would view it as a least a 10-year effort.
Do you feel Covington is at a point with its development system where the firm can consistently churn out more diverse than average classes?
I certainly hope so. I'm quite optimistic we can. One of the things I would point to is that the firm has a very strong culture of collaboration and sharing. We think that is pretty rare in the profession these days.
I have seen over and over again the willingness of our senior lawyers—our most senior partners—to create new opportunities for younger women lawyers and for diverse lawyers. They slot into projects and slot into client relationships, really creating a virtuous circle where you see the younger people coming along really being given fabulous opportunities by more senior people, and that in turn allows them to thrive. This is what builds the pipeline.
We don't have billing credits or origination credits at our firm. We don't use that model. Because we don't keep track of that, we see a lot of willingness of people to hand off projects and opportunities and client relationships to other people. And that has had a really profound effect on opportunities for a wide range of our newer partners.
The younger partners, whether women or diverse or not, are being given good chances because the incentive structure isn't impeding that kind of sharing.
We have seen this as a real advantage for us. Obviously the younger lawyers need to do their jobs once they have those opportunities, but they are really great lawyers and they are being given the chance to thrive at a relatively early stage in their career.
What systemic changes need to happen, in or out of firms, to make partner classes look more like law school graduate classes?
The law school classes are pretty diverse, from what I see. The question is whether the firms can nurture and retain the kind of talent that will help them diversify their partnerships. I do think it is a multiyear process. We do think it is has been helpful that our clients are really focusing on this and are encouraging it. I often say to our partners that this greater diversity within our firm is what we want for ourselves as a community of professionals, but we also see it as responding to something our clients are asking us to do. So the fact that the clients are asking us to do this and asking firms to respond to their wish for more diversity is a positive factor and it does encourage the law firms to respond.
Covington's new partners are: Stephanie Bignon, Nikhil Gore, Kate Mitchell-Tombras, Kayleigh Scalzo, Eric Sandberg-Zakian and Dustin Cho in Washington; Sarah Cowlishaw in London; Erin Thomas in New York; Neema Sahni and Ali Mojibi in Los Angeles; Megan Rodgers in Palo Alto, California; Yan Luo in Beijing; Derek Kiton in Dubai; and Helen Hwang in Shanghai.
Read More:
170 GCs Pen Open Letter to Law Firms: Improve on Diversity or Lose Our Business
Facebook Selects Kilpatrick for New Law Firm Diversity Award
What the NLJ 500 Tells Us About Law Firm Hiring, Diversity and Competition
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250