DLA Piper Partner Who Alleged Assault Pulls Kamala Harris Into Arbitration Dispute
Harris, who is married to a DLA Piper partner, has called out mandatory arbitration in the past.
October 07, 2019 at 12:07 PM
4 minute read
Note: This story has been updated to include a statement from Sen. Harris.
A lawyer for Vanina Guerrero, a DLA Piper partner who last week accused the co-managing partner of the firm's Silicon Valley office of sexual assault, is taking advantage of presidential politics to increase pressure over the firm's forced arbitration policy.
Guerrero's attorney, Jeanne Christensen at Wigdor, on Monday released an open letter to Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, who is married to a Los Angeles partner at the global law firm.
Christensen cited the California U.S. senator's past public opposition to forced arbitration and asked her to use her high-profile pulpit to speak out against the firm's policy.
"I am sure you would agree that silencing women through forced arbitration must end," she wrote to Harris. "No female employee, including a new partner, would knowingly agree to waive her right to our court system for claims involving sexual assault, battery or rape."
In June, Harris joined her Senate colleague Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, in urging JPMorgan Chase chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon to eliminate a forced arbitration clause used in that company's credit card contracts.
A sentence from that letter led Christensen's letter: "One of the fundamental principles of our democracy is that everyone should get their day in court. Forced arbitration deprives Americans of that basic right."
Guerrero on Oct. 3 distributed an initial open letter addressed to to DLA Piper U.S. co-chairs Roger Meltzer and Jay Rains, asking the pair to release her from her mandatory arbitration agreement with the firm. In that letter and an accompanying filing with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, she detailed multiple sexual assaults, as well as a pattern of bullying and later retaliation, deployed by partner Louis Lehot, who also co-chairs the firm's U.S. emerging growth and venture capital group.
In Monday's letter, her attorney expressed hope that Harris had either seen the letter or that her husband Douglas Emhoff, a litigator who joined DLA Piper in September 2017, had shared it with her. She told the senator that DLA Piper had neither released Guerrero from the arbitration clause or even responded to the letter, asserting that the firm had briefly wiped her name and profile from the firm's website Oct. 3 and engaged in other allegedly retaliatory conduct. Guererro's profile was active on the DLA Piper website Monday.
"It is time for DLA Piper to right this senseless wrong by declaring that no female employee, including female partners, will be forced to litigate claims for sexually motivated harm caused by male employees that fail to obey the rules," Christensen added.
Later on Monday, Harris' communications director provided a statement to NBC News reacting to the letter:
"Senator Harris has been and continues to be a staunch advocate for survivors and believes all people must be guaranteed their day in court," the statement said. "She has long opposed forced arbitration agreements and that position has not changed and she does not believe this is any exception."
A spokesman for DLA Piper said Oct. 3 that the firm had taken immediate steps to investigate once Guerrero went public with the accusations against Lehot. The firm did not immediately respond to a follow-up inquiry Monday.
This story has been updated to include a response from Sen. Harris.
|Read More
After DLA Piper Accusations, Should Law Firms Fear 'The Open Letter'?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250