Don't Let the 'C' in C-Suite Stand for Complacency
Law firms have room for improvement across the board, and should set their sights high.
October 07, 2019 at 03:37 PM
6 minute read
Having spent the better part of the past two decades in various roles both in-house and as a consultant to law firms, I've discovered an obvious truth: It is talent, not any other investment, that will single-handedly
make or break a firm's longevity and overall profitability. And I don't only mean a firm's attorney talent. In my experience, firms that nail the hiring and retention process for business professionals differentiate themselves from the rest of the pack.
I have invested substantial time to advocate for both an elevation in the value that the right senior marketing, business development and communications professional can provide to their law firms and in the way these positions are perceived. There is significant opportunity for improvement across all C-suite roles in law firms. Much of the legal industry is evolving to meet current business and client needs; however, many firms are handicapped when senior leaders fail to evolve, reinvent themselves and their functions, and drive change.
|Refining and Repositioning Roles
Administrative roles in law firms should not be viewed as overhead, nor are they simply "nice to have" among a sea of timekeepers. Truly skilled, savvy business services leaders, when carefully selected, can help steer a world-class, global business model to peak efficiency and effectiveness. The strategic law firm C-suite collectively identifies opportunities to maximize profitability, effectively delivers on change management and constantly looks to improve upon and elevate business goals, taking the initiative to proactively detail the value the role provides to firm management for illustrative purposes.
As in any industry, many C-level executives in law firms have long tenure but may lack innovative and strategic drive. As a result, they are perceived as a support function rather than challenging the status quo, bringing new ideas and steering their organizations for the future. While the damage to a firm's infrastructure may not be noticeable on the surface, a laissez-faire approach to functional leadership can erode a firm's ability to innovate and position itself for the future. As we see C-level roles in firms evolve in both sophistication and relevance, an opportunity is born. The departure of a long-tenured incumbent leader allows for new executives to redefine these roles and set heightened goals for their value within firm management.
I have spent significant time helping to elevate and redirect the perception of those in the chief marketing and business development seats, but I have seen limited growth in the level of strategic human resources leadership in Am Law firms. During a recent engagement in which my company, Calibrate Legal, helped a large global firm to completely restructure a department, I was stunned to discover that the chief human resources officer had no previous knowledge of how a retained search process works as compared with contingency, nor were basic job descriptions and organizational charts in place. Functional basics are the requisite platform necessary before HR can effectively add value by providing thoughtful talent management strategies. Firms aren't focusing on their biggest return on investment opportunity: their talent.
|The Chicken or the Egg
It may appear that simply cleaning house and hiring a new C-level executive would be an easy fix to a lack of sophisticated leadership. The problem with this approach is two-fold. First, the internal hiring practices at many firms could use a major overhaul. Second, many firms miss out on opportunities to gain alternative perspectives by failing to explore candidates from outside of the legal industry. On the first issue, the hiring procedures with which business professionals are vetted often result in a time-consuming, counterproductive and self-perpetuating process that benefits neither the firm nor the candidates being considered.
I recently witnessed a hiring committee deftly bypass the typical initial interview process when searching for a C-level executive, leaping directly into an acerbic panel interview with a highly confrontational undertone. The candidate was pelted with a series of behavioral questions, with no room to provide color for circumstances being cited in her responses, and she was treated with a lack of respect that she found appalling. Is this how you want people experiencing your firm? Actions like this breed a toxic culture and further the unacceptable practice of treating skilled executive talent as if they are a subservient class to lawyers in firms.
In addressing the second issue, it's important to note that many C-level executives are actively seeking ways in which to gain knowledge from outside of our industry to grow their performance capacity. Unfortunately, not all leaders proactively pursue educational opportunities to enhance their skillsets, and they tend to jump from one similar role to another. Even the most polished executives lack a propensity for innovation if they simply move from one firm to another without any mode to gain perspective. Once a firm's hiring practices are addressed, I implore you to look outside of legal or include candidates who have alternative experience in other industries peppered throughout their career paths.
|What to Expect From the C-Suite
Firm management should engage business services leaders to help define business goals. In the evolving legal arena, in which the class system is slowly being removed from firms, leaders can work together toward a common objective. An effective law firm C-suite should be a vital part of the leadership team.
Calibrate Legal and Intapp recently conducted an industrywide survey that found nearly all chief marketing officers are tasked with implementing business strategy, yet less than 20% of them have a seat at the table in creating that strategy. Allowing C-suite executives a seat at the management table in influencing strategic firm decisions creates a culture of inclusivity and value in these roles necessary to retain top talent. If you do not have the trust in your C-suite talent to invite them to the table, then perhaps you don't have the right talent.
Expect more innovation from your C-suite. In fact, insist upon more innovation, and take the time to understand why it makes a difference. Treat your executive candidates with the level of respect you would demand if you were in their shoes, and ensure that your leaders bring innate value to your organization. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, firm leaders who take the time to truly understand the value that their C-suite brings to running the business of the law firm will thrive.
Jennifer Johnson Scalzi is the CEO of law firm consultancy Calibrate Legal. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250