Louis Lehot Pushed Out at DLA Piper Following Sexual Assault Allegations
"The firm has concluded for various reasons that it is in the best interest of the firm that we part ways with Louis Lehot," leadership said in a firmwide email Friday.
October 11, 2019 at 05:51 PM
3 minute read
Louis Lehot, the DLA Piper partner who was accused of sexual assault by a fellow partner last week, has been let go by the firm, sources confirmed Friday afternoon.
In an email to DLA Piper lawyers and staff Friday afternoon, the text of which was obtained by The American Lawyer, firm leadership acknowledged Lehot's departure.
"We are saddened that this type of allegation has arisen at our firm," the email said, regarding partner Vanina Guerrero's allegation that Lehot sexually assaulted her multiple times after recruiting her to join the firm.
"Despite the fact that the allegations have not been substantiated by the investigation to date, the firm has concluded for various reasons that it is in the best interest of the firm that we part ways with Louis Lehot," the email said. "We understand and share the deep concern about this matter, and would like to be in a position to share more detailed information. This is an ongoing legal matter, however, and therefore we cannot share further details."
The firm also noted in its email that "we remain steadfastly committed to our zero-tolerance policy for harassment in the workplace."
Lehot's biography was no longer on DLA Piper's website as of Friday afternoon, though it had appeared there earlier in the day. Lehot did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A spokesman for DLA Piper did not respond to requests for comment Friday afternoon.
Stacy Paz, now listed as the sole managing partner of the firm's Palo Alto, California, office, said, "I'm sorry, I can't speak right now," when reached by phone Friday afternoon.
Guerrero lodged sexual assault accusations against Lehot and called out the firm's mandatory arbitration policy in an open letter and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filing last week.
Reached for comment Friday, Guerrero's lawyer, Jeanne M. Christensen of Wigdor LLP, said letting Lehot go is a "first step."
"But DLA Piper has said nothing about releasing Ms. Guerrero from forced arbitration," Christensen said. "This continued silence means DLA Piper intends to enforce the provision. It needs to explain why."
Also Friday, a lawyer who formerly worked in DLA Piper's office of general counsel published a response to Guerrero's letter on the website Medium, in which she offered support to Guerrero and criticized DLA Piper's mandatory arbitration policy. She said the firm has a "culture of intimidation and oppression."
Ross Todd and Dan Packel contributed to this report.
Read More
DLA Piper Partner Accused of Sexual Assault in EEOC Claim, Open Letter
After DLA Piper Accusations, Should Law Firms Fear 'The Open Letter'?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250