DLA Piper Removes Female Partner Who Alleged Sex Assault, Triggering 'Smear Campaign' Accusation
Vanina Guerrero's allegations that Louis Lehot sexually assaulted her led to his firing. Now the firm says it uncovered misconduct allegations about Guerrero, unrelated to her accusations against Lehot, and has placed her on administrative leave.
October 16, 2019 at 11:58 AM
3 minute read
The DLA Piper partner who alleged that a senior partner sexually assaulted her has been placed on administrative leave, the firm said Wednesday morning, pointing to allegations that she harassed another lawyer at the firm.
The firm said in a statement that Vanina Guerrero was placed on leave immediately. Last week, Guerrero's public accusation that partner Louis Lehot sexually assaulted her led to him being fired from the firm. The firm, referring to Guerrero by her maiden name, de Verneuil, in its statement, emphasized that the allegations against her are completely unrelated to her own allegations against Lehot.
"This was done because, during the course of our investigation into her claims, serious issues were brought to the firm's attention regarding Ms. de Verneuil's conduct towards and involving others at the firm. It has been determined that these issues, which are unrelated to Ms. de Verneuil's claims, require a separate investigation," the firm said.
Guerrero's attorneys at Wigdor LLP provided a copy of the letter Guerrero received from DLA Piper, which is dated Tuesday. In an emailed statement, her lawyers accused DLA Piper of engaging in a "smear campaign" against Guerrero.
The letter, signed by DLA Piper's Americas managing partner, Stasia Kelly, said: "As you know, during the course of our investigation of your allegations against Louis Lehot, another individual at the firm alleged that you engaged in inappropriate behavior toward, and harassed, that individual."
The letter also alleged that Guerrero has not cooperated in the firm's investigations of Lehot and herself. And it noted that Arnold & Porter has been retained to investigate the claims against Guerrero.
Wigdor LLP partner Jeanne Christensen added, "There may be legal ramifications for publicizing administrative leave," and that she's informed DLA.
"We've fought lots of these fights in the press: Fox News, Bill O'Reilly. You would think a law firm knows better. I cannot think of another [instance] where we've represented an individual bringing accusations against an abuser and the employer has come out with this type of smear," Christensen said.
In its own public statement, DLA Piper declined to give more specific detail on Guerrero's alleged conduct.
"Given the nature of these serious claims, as well as Ms. de Verneuil's refusal to cooperate regarding the allegations against her, the firm has determined that the best course of action at this time is to place Ms. de Verneuil on paid administrative leave. We are not in a position to comment further now other than to provide this brief statement in order to ensure that the public record is accurate in light of extensive public commentary from Ms. de Verneuil and her lawyers."
In her open letter about Lehot's alleged conduct, Guerrero asked the firm to release her from a mandatory arbitration agreement. She also published a complaint to the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, which detailed her allegations.
|Read More
DLA Piper Partner Accused of Sexual Assault in EEOC Claim, Open Letter
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250