Amid Partner Losses, Pierce Says 'Not Everyone' Can Be a SEAL
Six partners, some of whom have been at the firm for less than a year, have left Pierce Bainbridge since August, according to announcements at their new firms or public posts.
October 17, 2019 at 03:44 PM
4 minute read
Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht, the self-described fastest-growing firm in the history of the world, has been contracting lately.
Six partners have left since August, according to announcements by their new firms and public posts. Three are in New York, and the others are in Boston, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
The departures come amid a contentious legal feud between Pierce Bainbridge and a former partner on both coasts, litigation that has included allegations about the firm's management and litigation financing strategy.
John Pierce, the firm's global managing partner, said in a statement to Law.com on Wednesday that he had great respect for the lawyers who left and wished them well. But as the former tank commander frequently does, he compared his firm to the special forces, saying that "not everyone is cut out for SEAL training or Ranger School."
"The reality is this is not an easy firm to work at. We have tremendous fun and try the best cases. But the culture of this firm is often extremely stressful and intense," he wrote, adding each firm lawyer is responsible for trying cases, developing business and helping with management tasks. "Our people must have not only thick skin but skin made of kevlar combined with titanium at times. The only lawyers who should join our firm are the ones who can do all of those things and who can swallow some risk."
The six partner exits include Michael Winograd, the co-founder of Pierce Bainbridge's New York office, who has moved to Brown Rudnick; Deborah Renner, a New York class actions specialist formerly of Baker & Hostetler who appears to have started her own firm; Robert Allen, an intellectual property lawyer in Los Angeles, who left for Glaser Weil Fink Howard Avchen & Shapiro; Susan Winkler in Boston, a longtime federal prosecutor who started her own firm; Jeff Alexander, a commercial litigator in New York; and Joan Meyer in Washington, D.C., who worked on compliance and investigations.
The six declined to comment directly on why they left Pierce Bainbridge or couldn't be reached for comment. Allen said he was excited to rejoin a former colleague from McKool Smith with his move to Glaser Weil. Meyer declined to state which firm she was joining. The other four recently departed partners didn't respond to comment requests on Wednesday and Thursday.
Pierce has frequently stated his desire to join the profitability ranks or overtake in strength some of the country's top litigation firms, including Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, where he previously worked, saying that his firm's use of litigation funding and cutting-edge legal tech set it apart.
He hit those same notes in his Wednesday statement to Law.com, asserting, "within a few to several years we will be the most dominant and profitable global litigation firm."
Meanwhile, the litigation between Pierce Bainbridge and a former partner, Donald Lewis, which burst into public view earlier this year, is still making headlines almost every month. Lewis said he was fired for telling Pierce to stop wasting money that had been loaned to the firm by litigation funders such as Pravati Capital, and he has filed pages of screenshots of texts, Slack messages and emails that depict Pierce as a sexist with substance abuse issues and his partners as unwilling to stop him.
The firm has fired back with a suit of its own that accuses Lewis of engaging in extortion. Pierce Bainbridge has said Lewis' allegations are false and meant to distract from the fact that he was terminated amid a probe into a staffer's sexual assault allegations that it deemed credible. Lewis has said those allegations are false.
Asked about whether the Lewis case has had any impact on the firm, Pierce said no.
"Like any organization that has grown at light speed, change is part of our culture," he said. "A few of our outstanding colleagues have moved on, and we wish them nothing but the best. We continue to capture the attention of the entire legal industry with our uncanny ability to attract top-tier talent and file cutting-edge cases."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250