Outsourcing Is Popular as Ever, but New Nelson Mullins Team Sees Its Evolution
Edward Hansen, who joined Nelson Mullins from Morgan Lewis, said his practice isn't necessarily about outsourcing jobs, but solving problems, especially with technology.
October 17, 2019 at 04:22 PM
4 minute read
During the 1990s and early 2000s, outsourcing made a lot of waves as companies found ways to engage third parties to handle information technology work and farm many jobs out to less expensive labor markets. For many, that meant the elimination of a job and a negative association with the concept.
While outsourcing and business process change can still frequently translate into layoffs, the process has evolved, according to recent Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough hires Edward Hansen and Valerie Gross, and can also mean making existing workers more efficient—and, they say, happier.
"Cost savings and labor arbitrage are still involved," said Hansen, who recently joined the firm as partner and co-chair of the firm's outsourcing and digital transformation practice from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius. "But now companies are using outsourcing as a vehicle for transformation."
Hansen and Gross, based in New York, help companies negotiate complex contracts with outsourcing vendors, mostly involving technologies aimed at transforming an existing business process or driving efficiency.
Hansen said the outsourcing market is actually much larger than it was in the 1990s. But now, instead of simply contracting a third party to do work at a lower cost, businesses are using outsourcing and digital transformation to change the way employees work.
"One of the misconceptions with this is the loss of employees," Hansen said. "Companies find that their employees are being bogged down by tasks that they shouldn't need to do or they don't have the experience to handle. That doesn't mean the employee goes away, it just means they will work in a different manner."
Hansen and Gross practiced together at Morgan Lewis from 2016 until earlier this month, and prior to that worked together for two years at McCarter & English. They specialize in "information technology outsourcing, business process outsourcing, enterprise resource planning, digital transformation, re-platforming, and other complex system integrations," according to a firm release.
"As chair of the firm's legacy technology and procurement industry group, I'm excited to see our practice expand its capabilities in complex sourcing and digital transformation," said Jason Epstein, who co-chairs both the technology and outsourcing and digital transformation groups at Nelson Mullins, in a statement. "Ed and Val bring a unique whole-deal mindset that stresses relationship building, deal economics, hard-core collaboration, and human-based efficiencies. This thought leadership will be a tremendous benefit to our clients and the industry as a whole."
Hansen said his team is "vendor agnostic" when it comes to guiding clients in outsourcing deals, and they do not make recommendations on whether a particular provider should handle, say, a system migration or integration.
He said one of their main roles while working with clients is to help smooth the contracting process, to make sure agreements aren't too restrictive.
"Lawyers do what they find most comfortable, and the language in the contract ends up being too aggressive," Hansen said. "If people are going to suffer consequences because of one small misstep, they can't be creative."
Hansen said that while many firms have had outsourcing practices since the 1990s, he feels that there's little direct competition to the type of practice that he and Gross have developed.
"Our contracts are up there with anyone in the industry," he said. "But we take a look at the language, the psychology, the economics. If you create a place where people can come together, they can solve problems."
|Read More
Lawyers Who Don't Embrace Tech Will Be Replaced by Those Who Do, Says HSF Innovator
With Gowdy Advising Trump, Nelson Mullins Pulls Double Duty in Impeachment Fight
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250