Akin Latest to Bolster IP Talent With Boutique Hires From Finnegan
As large firms continue to absorb IP boutiques and practices from smaller firms, Akin Gump joined in, hiring two longtime partners from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner in Washington, D.C.
October 22, 2019 at 02:10 PM
5 minute read
The market for IP lawyers is still hot, but where they are practicing may be changing. Larger, general practice firms have been picking off IP attorneys via mergers, but also a la carte, including a pair of recent hires by Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld.
Akin this month added IP attorneys Andrew Holtman and Brandon Rash to its Washington, D.C., office from IP boutique Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, in the latest instance of IP lawyers leaving boutiques for general practice firms.
Examples of larger moves abound, with Venable picking up 100-lawyer Fitzpatrick Cella in 2018, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick absorbing Fraser Clemens Martin & Miller in 2017 and Dickinson Wright picking up Mayback & Hoffman, also in 2018.
On the a la carte front, several Big Law firms have lured away talent from Irell & Manella, which has seen eight partners leave in recent months, including two former managing partners. Former managing partner Ellison Turner left for Kirkland & Ellis earlier this week, while former managing partner David Gindler and two other IP attorneys left for Milbank in August. Irell also saw attorneys move to McDermott Will & Emery and Mayer Brown.
And, while larger firms may be seeking out IP specialists for their expertise and clientele, the attraction goes both ways.
"IP is an underlying component to most business, even though I only address it from a narrow standpoint," Holtman said. "But now [at Akin] I get to see the application of IP from a broader spectrum."
Holtman has a Ph.D. in molecular genetics, and Rash was a technical engineer for a semiconductor manufacturer before entering the legal profession. Both said it was time to move to a platform that could further their practice with a more global presence at a general practice firm that would allow them to have greater exposure to all the areas in which IP is relevant.
Both Rash and Holtman said they appreciated the fact that Akin has an existing "deep bench" when it comes to IP attorneys and were excited to be a part of it. According to a firm spokesperson, the firm currently has about 50 attorneys in its IP practice. Although it has not followed the trend of absorbing smaller boutiques, the spokesperson said the practice has grown through laterals.
"Our IP team has a well-established reputation as a go-to firm for life sciences and high tech-focused patent disputes, and the addition of Andy and Brandon will be a perfect complement to those strengths," Akin chairperson Kim Koopersmith said in a statement.
The firm said that both Holtman and Rash focus on "matters relating to electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, software arts, and drug and biological molecular science."
"Patent disputes can be incredibly complex and technical, requiring both detailed subject matter knowledge and a keen understanding of the litigation process," Steven Maslowski, head of Akin's intellectual property practice, said in a statement. "Their work in the areas of electronics, computing and software, in particular, will align well with our established strengths handling life sciences and tech-related patent disputes."
Holtman and Rash are counting on that expertise to retain their existing books of business and grow them at Akin.
"I think it is fair to say that there has been a greater push to be particular about who is assessing their technology," Holtman said of clients' emerging needs. "Budgets tend to be a lot tighter, and someone with a greater understanding can do more and do it more quickly."
As far as whether IP boutiques are feeling the consolidation and budgetary squeeze, there are still dissenting views. While anecdotal evidence does show movement away from the boutique model toward Big Law, there is a lot of back-and-forth as to whether this is a legitimate market trend. For example, as recently as three years ago, a study by Lex Machina showed a decrease in the IP work done by Am Law 100 firms.
Regardless, Rash and Holtman are now another recent example of movement away from boutiques, even if most of their careers were spent in that setting. Prior to joining Akin, Rash had 12 years at Finnegan, less than a year at Hunton & Williams as a patent attorney and was at the U.S. district court as a law clerk for a little over a year. Holtman had spent his entire 18-year legal career at Finnegan before making the move over to Akin.
|Read More
Akin Gump Adds London Private Equity Partner From Orrick
Deal Watch: Wachtell, S&C, Kirkland Spearhead Pharma Deal, Energy Moves and Hotels Unite
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 2US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 3Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 4McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 5Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250