Is Lateral Hiring a Diversity Blindspot for Big Law?
Law firm recruiter Merle Vaughn has made it her business to recruit minority candidates. But she says she's eager for the day when her niche won't be needed anymore.
October 22, 2019 at 06:32 PM
5 minute read
Despite eagerly touting their efforts to enhance diversity, major law firms have remained stubbornly homogenous, especially at the top. As it stands, racial and ethnic minorities comprise 33% of law school graduating classes but only 9% of equity partnerships, according to the National Association for Law Placement and the Minority Corporate Counsel Association.
Most firms acknowledge the need to identify and recruit diverse associates and to support and promote them. But what about ensuring diversity in firms' lateral partner pipeline?
Los Angles-based Merle Vaughn, senior lateral partner recruiter and law firm diversity practice leader at Major, Lindsey & Africa, knows these issues better than most.
A former associate at Cooley with a string of notable placements under her belt, Vaughn took a somewhat circuitous route to becoming one of the best-known recruiters of diverse lateral candidates in the U.S.
She left the law for a time to open a business with her husband before opting to try her hand at legal recruiting. And she quickly found herself carving out a very specific niche.
"It happened very fast," she said of turning her recruiting focus to diverse hires more than 15 years ago. "At the time, I was pretty much the only Am Law 100 recruiter that was black."
She said things ramped up quickly once she decided to focus on diverse recruiting, and she received a lot of referrals from candidates who "felt they didn't get treated fairly or were misunderstood."
She said while the number of minority recruiters has increased, the number is still quite low for the amount of work available.
"[People] shouldn't make broad generalizations," she said when asked whether she thought that fewer minority recruiters meant fewer opportunities for minority laterals. "But I don't think not having more diverse recruiters is helping the industry."
Vaughn made sure to state that just because a recruiter happens to be a minority, that doesn't mean that they need to specialize in recruiting other minorities. But, she said there are some cultural differences and experiences that a minority recruiter could better relate to.
"You can't overestimate the value of experiences, and that is what diversity is all about," she said. "They frame how we go about the world and help us understand not just how the world works for us, but for others."
Firms often bring her in to consult on their diversity programs on top of working with her for diverse lateral hires. She said that in this process, the first question she asks is, "What are you willing to do differently to get a different result?" Vaughn said the answer to that question can usually tell her whether the firm is going to be successful in its diversity program or not.
One thing she has noticed in these consultations, as well as in her lateral recruiting practice, is the different standards that minority attorneys are held to.
She used the example of a potential hire who happened to be a minority. The partnership of the firm liked his credentials but wasn't sure if they would be able to provide an appropriate fit and that the minority hire, as opposed to a white one, might have a "target on their back."
"They were less willing to take a risk with the minority candidate," she said.
But, she said she has seen clients get on board and drive firms to be more diligent about diverse hires.
"Firms have come to me for advice because they have lost business," she said.
While progress overall is slow, Vaughn did say there were certain areas where, along with client demand, demographics are now helping shape demand for diverse hires.
"Trial lawyers," she said. "Almost every law firm I work with is looking for a diverse trial lawyer. I mean, look at who makes up the jury."
When asked about the future of diverse recruiting, she said succinctly that "It would be wonderful to just have 'recruiting,' and not diversity recruiting."
Read More:
At More Than One-Third of the Am Law 100, Minority Partners Are Disproportionately Nonequity
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief Returns to Debevoise
- 2Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
- 3Tragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
- 4Weil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
- 5Big Banks Did Great Last Year. What Does That Mean for Big Law?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250