Is Lateral Hiring a Diversity Blindspot for Big Law?
Law firm recruiter Merle Vaughn has made it her business to recruit minority candidates. But she says she's eager for the day when her niche won't be needed anymore.
October 22, 2019 at 06:32 PM
5 minute read
Despite eagerly touting their efforts to enhance diversity, major law firms have remained stubbornly homogenous, especially at the top. As it stands, racial and ethnic minorities comprise 33% of law school graduating classes but only 9% of equity partnerships, according to the National Association for Law Placement and the Minority Corporate Counsel Association.
Most firms acknowledge the need to identify and recruit diverse associates and to support and promote them. But what about ensuring diversity in firms' lateral partner pipeline?
Los Angles-based Merle Vaughn, senior lateral partner recruiter and law firm diversity practice leader at Major, Lindsey & Africa, knows these issues better than most.
A former associate at Cooley with a string of notable placements under her belt, Vaughn took a somewhat circuitous route to becoming one of the best-known recruiters of diverse lateral candidates in the U.S.
She left the law for a time to open a business with her husband before opting to try her hand at legal recruiting. And she quickly found herself carving out a very specific niche.
"It happened very fast," she said of turning her recruiting focus to diverse hires more than 15 years ago. "At the time, I was pretty much the only Am Law 100 recruiter that was black."
She said things ramped up quickly once she decided to focus on diverse recruiting, and she received a lot of referrals from candidates who "felt they didn't get treated fairly or were misunderstood."
She said while the number of minority recruiters has increased, the number is still quite low for the amount of work available.
"[People] shouldn't make broad generalizations," she said when asked whether she thought that fewer minority recruiters meant fewer opportunities for minority laterals. "But I don't think not having more diverse recruiters is helping the industry."
Vaughn made sure to state that just because a recruiter happens to be a minority, that doesn't mean that they need to specialize in recruiting other minorities. But, she said there are some cultural differences and experiences that a minority recruiter could better relate to.
"You can't overestimate the value of experiences, and that is what diversity is all about," she said. "They frame how we go about the world and help us understand not just how the world works for us, but for others."
Firms often bring her in to consult on their diversity programs on top of working with her for diverse lateral hires. She said that in this process, the first question she asks is, "What are you willing to do differently to get a different result?" Vaughn said the answer to that question can usually tell her whether the firm is going to be successful in its diversity program or not.
One thing she has noticed in these consultations, as well as in her lateral recruiting practice, is the different standards that minority attorneys are held to.
She used the example of a potential hire who happened to be a minority. The partnership of the firm liked his credentials but wasn't sure if they would be able to provide an appropriate fit and that the minority hire, as opposed to a white one, might have a "target on their back."
"They were less willing to take a risk with the minority candidate," she said.
But, she said she has seen clients get on board and drive firms to be more diligent about diverse hires.
"Firms have come to me for advice because they have lost business," she said.
While progress overall is slow, Vaughn did say there were certain areas where, along with client demand, demographics are now helping shape demand for diverse hires.
"Trial lawyers," she said. "Almost every law firm I work with is looking for a diverse trial lawyer. I mean, look at who makes up the jury."
When asked about the future of diverse recruiting, she said succinctly that "It would be wonderful to just have 'recruiting,' and not diversity recruiting."
|Read More:
At More Than One-Third of the Am Law 100, Minority Partners Are Disproportionately Nonequity
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250