Shearman Grows CFIUS Practice With DLA Piper Partner Hire
Changing policy priorities and continued foreign appetite for U.S. investment are keeping CFIUS experts in demand.
October 28, 2019 at 05:46 PM
2 minute read
The Trump administration's push for increased national security oversight over inbound investments has put a big spotlight on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States—and has helped to supercharge the lateral market for lawyers who can boast CFIUS expertise.
Shearman & Sterling is the latest to beef up its CFIUS practice, adding John Beahn as partner in its Washington, D.C., office. Beahn was most recently a partner in the telecommunications practice at DLA Piper, which he joined in January 2018 after practicing in the CFIUS and communications groups at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
According to a firm statement Monday, Beahn has over 20 years of experience counseling clients on national security matters, as well as supply chains, risk mitigation and compliance monitoring.
He will join partner Robert LaRussa, a former Commerce Department under secretary for international trade, in Shearman's CFIUS practice.
"John's stellar CFIUS experience will bolster our offering to help clients navigate complex cross-border transactions in an increasingly complicated regulatory and geopolitical environment," David Beveridge, senior partner at Shearman, said in a statement. "His arrival further strengthens our ability to advise clients on transactional matters in the U.S. and globally."
Beahn has worked with several notable clients over the years, including Virgin Mobile, Gateway, Nokia Siemens and Sprint Nextel, among others.
The Trump administration's policy priorities, as well as increased foreign investment in U.S. companies—particularly by China and in the technology sector—have significantly increased CFIUS' workload recently, with more and more transactions requiring examination.
That has helped spark a string of lateral moves as firms have worked to shore up their respective practices.
New draft CFIUS guidelines were released in September that would expand the scope of the review process. Among other things, the draft rules would require scrutiny of a broader range of investments related to technology, infrastructure and personal data.
|Read More
CFIUS Arms Race Heats Up With Hires at V&E, Linklaters, Norton Rose Fulbright
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250