Kelley Drye Adds Rosenfeld to Big Law's Female Managing Partner Ranks
Starting Jan. 1, Dana Rosenfeld will take on a role that is still held by relatively few women across Big Law.
October 30, 2019 at 03:52 PM
4 minute read
Kelley Drye & Warren has announced it is appointing Dana Rosenfeld as its next managing partner, starting Jan. 1, 2020, propelling Rosenfeld into a role that is still rare for a woman to hold.
Rosenfeld will be the first woman in Kelley Drye's 183-year history to serve as managing partner, taking over for Lew Rose, who is set to retire at the end of the year. Rosenfeld was chair of the New York-based firm's privacy and information security practice for nine years and has served on multiple committees within the firm.
"It is a shame that there aren't more women managing partners nationally," Rosenfeld said in an interview.
She said she has been able to meet recently with a number of managing partners—both men and women—and learn from their experiences.
"I think women have a particular experience, which is a little bit different," Rosenfeld said. "I'm grateful to learn from other women who have come before me."
Rosenfeld has been working alongside Rose to learn how the firm operates since the beginning of this year. Firm chair Jim Carr said he began looking for Rose's replacement in 2018 after Rose told him he planned to retire at the end of 2019. By the end of last year, Carr had picked Rosenfeld as Rose's successor, a decision that was approved by the firm's executive committee.
"Dana was the most qualified candidate out of everyone I considered, and it happened also that Dana is a woman," Carr said. "It's important to note that this role is not just going to Dana because she is a woman; it's going to Dana because she is the most qualified candidate at Kelley Drye."
There aren't many managing partners like Rosenfeld, if the survey statistics from the National Association of Women Lawyers are any indication. Women make up 25% of firm governance roles and 22% of firmwide managing partners, according to the 97 law firms that responded to NAWL's survey in early 2018.
Women make up 20% of office-level managing partners and 22% of practice group leaders, the survey found. The organization stated that "this is the area of the most progress, but the numbers still lag behind the representation of women in the legal profession as a whole."
Rosenfeld touted the efforts of Carr and Rose over the past five to seven years to improve the firm's diversity. Four of the nine people on the firm's executive committee are women, while the managing partner of the firm's second-largest office, in Washington, D.C., is also a woman.
According to ALM's data, Kelley Drye from 2011 to 2016 ranked between No. 33 and 42 on the Am Law 200′s diversity rankings. But in 2017, the firm's ranking slipped to No. 86, and it is currently in 76th place. In terms of gender, Kelley Drye is ranked at No. 149, but the firm last year reported its highest percentage of female attorneys working at firm—38.2%—since 2011.
Kelley Drye reported in 2019 that 18.3% of its partners are women, and Rosenfeld said that number is set to grow. Women make up 53% of the firm's associates and 58% of its special counsel, which at Kelley Drye is a position between senior associate and partner, Rosenfeld said.
"As you can see, we have women in the position to grow and be elevated to partnership over time," Rosenfeld said. "We're well-positioned, growing organically, to move high numbers of women into partnership."
Carr noted that Kelley Drye had an exclusively all-white, all-male partnership and an associate pool that was "almost exclusively" white men when he joined in October 1988.
Kelley Drye's revenue grew 0.4% last year to more than $243 million. Both Carr and Rosenfeld indicated they're satisfied with the firm's overall financial performance, with Carr pointing out that the firm has taken steps to cut costs and boost overall profits, including relocating its New York office to a cheaper space.
"At the end of the day, it's not the bottom line in terms of revenue," Carr said. "It's the type of firm that we are."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ready to Respond': Wilmer's Robert Kimmitt and Covington's Stephen Rademaker Worked to Free U.S. Journalists
3 minute readNewly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250