Shkreli Lawyer Evan Greebel Has Conviction Upheld by Second Circuit
The decision could make it difficult for Greebel, who was suspended from the bar, to practice law again. Greebel is no longer behind bars and is now living in a halfway house.
October 30, 2019 at 01:10 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Evan Greebel, the former partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman and Kaye Scholer convicted of fraud conspiracy for helping Martin Shkreli rip off his company Retrophin, had his conviction affirmed by a federal appeals court Wednesday.
In a three-page summary order, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said Greebel was mistaken in his arguments that the jury was given bad instructions and that one of his expert witnesses should have been allowed to testify.
The decision could make it difficult for Greebel, who was suspended from the bar, to practice law again. He was given an 18-month prison sentence after his December 2017 conviction. He is living in a halfway house, where prisoners can reintegrate into society while finishing their sentences, after being transferred on Sept. 27 from the federal prison in Otisville, according to the Bureau of Prisons.
In the Wednesday decision, the appellate panel, composed of Judges Rosemary Pooler and Joseph Bianco of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves of the U.S. Court of International Trade, sided with Greebel on the standard of review to apply. But the panel said the challenged decisions by U.S. District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto of the Eastern District of New York were correct.
Matsumoto's decisions were consistent with Second Circuit case law, and on two points, even if they hadn't been, Greebel hadn't shown how he was harmed by them, the appeals court ruled.
"Under any articulation of an attorney's duty of disclosure, Greebel would need to disclose that Retrophin was committed to pay or was paying millions of dollars to investors defrauded by its CEO [Shkreli]," the court said.
Greebel's jury instruction argument had received some support from a group of legal ethics and professional responsibility experts who filed an amicus brief during his appeal.
It wasn't immediately clear whether Greebel would appeal his case further. The Second Circuit is known for only rarely granting requests for rehearing. Kannon Shanmugam, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison who represents Greebel, declined to comment. John Williams, Michael Mestitz and Meng Jia Yang of Williams & Connolly also worked on Greebel's appeal.
The government was represented by a team from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, including Alixandra Smith, David James, David Pitluck and David Kessler. A spokesman for the office declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readVersatility and 'Fearlessness' Drive Sullivan & Cromwell's Corporate Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250