Lathrop Inks Merger With Minnesota Firm as Midwest Stays Hot
The deal with Gray Plant Mooty will create a 400-lawyer firm with 14 U.S. offices, anchored in the upper and lower Midwest and with a presence on each coast.
October 31, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Lathrop Gage and Gray Plant Mooty will combine next year to form Lathrop GPM, the firms announced Thursday, creating a new 400-lawyer firm and extending a streak of Midwest law firm mergers.
The deal, effective Jan. 1, 2020, will unite Kansas City, Missouri-based Lathrop Gage's 240 attorneys with Minneapolis-headquartered Gray Plant Mooty's 155 lawyers. With 14 offices—concentrated in the Midwest but including coastal outposts in Boston, Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles—Lathrop GPM will have a deeper presence in the heartland as well as a broader national reach, the firms said.
The firms' combined revenue, which they estimated at about $208 million, would place Lathrop GPM at No. 140 on the 2019 Am Law 200 list—roughly even with similarly sized, Chicago-based Hinshaw & Culbertson.
Lathrop was No. 178 in the Am Law rankings this year, based on 2018 revenue of $124.3 million. Lathrop's revenue and head count have declined together for three years running, according to ALM data.
The merger comes two months after another union of firms centered in the lower and upper Midwest, including Minnesota. Taft Stettinius & Hollister, with its largest offices in Indianapolis and Cincinnati, and Minneapolis-based Briggs and Morgan announced at the end of August that they plan to merge their 600-plus attorneys to create a firm with combined revenue estimated above $350 million.
Earlier this month, global megafirm Dentons announced simultaneous combinations with Bingham Greenebaum Doll and Cohen & Grigsby, two Midwest regional players with 320 attorneys between them.
According to law firm consultancy Altman Weil, every U.S. merger announcement in 2019 that included an acquired firm with more than 100 lawyers has involved the Midwest.
In an interview, Lathrop Gage managing partner R. Cameron Garrison, who will lead Lathrop GPM, said the new combination was facilitated by Kristin Stark at Fairfax Associates and that the two firms started serious discussions in early June of this year.
"It was a thorough but relatively quick, process," Garrison said, adding that before the combination, the firms did not view themselves as market competitors.
Garrison will also chair Lathrop GPM's executive committee. Michael Sullivan Jr., Gray Plant Mooty's managing partner, will be partner-in-charge of the new firm's Minneapolis office and member of the executive committee. The additional 11 members of Lathrop GPM's executive committee will be made up of partners from both legacy firms.
Both firms have long histories in their home markets; Gray Plant Mooty, founded just one year after the end of the Civil War, calls itself the "oldest continuing law practice" in Minneapolis, while Lathrop, founded in 1873, claims to be the oldest continuously operating law firm west of the Mississippi River.
Garrison said that the combination will add depth to key practice areas: The corporate and employment labor practices will both double in size, and the litigation department will also grow. But he said the true value of the merger is how Lathrop's and Gray Plant Mooty's distinct practice areas will complement one another. Gray Plant Mooty brings particular strengths in franchise, health law, higher education, M&A and nonprofit practices, while Lathrop has notable life sciences, patent prosecution, insurance recovery, tax credits, environmental law, tort litigation and energy practices, according to the firms.
With an enhanced geographic and practice mix, Lathrop GPM will be able to provide broader and better service to clients than either firm on its own, Garrison said.
"This decision is really about our clients," he said. "We're a national firm with national talent. This combined firm will position us to better serve our clients and offer better depth and breadth in our practice area."
The merger will also give Lathrop access to the Minneapolis market, which has lately been drawing renewed attention from large, out-of-town firms hoping to add a presence there. One such firm, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, broke into the market earlier this year, hiring away eight Gray Plant Mooty partners to do so. Greenberg Traurig, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith and Spencer Fane are among other 2019 arrivals to the city.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal 200 Firms Gaining Deal Share Amid Race to Build in India
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250