Fortress Shutters Litigation Funder Vannin's US, Germany Operations
Fortress announced the acquisition of Vannin in September, almost a year after the litigation funder ditched plans to go public.
November 01, 2019 at 04:38 PM
4 minute read
Global investment manager Fortress Investment Group has shuttered the U.S. and Germany offices of Vannin Capital after announcing its acquisition of the litigation funder in September.
At the time of Fortress' announcement, Vannin employed six managing directors in the United States and one in Europe. All of these personnel are gone from the company's website, as are references to Vannin's offices in New York, Washington, D.C., and Bonn, Germany, along with Melbourne, Australia.
Vannin retains presences in London, Sydney, the Isle of Man, Jersey and Paris, according to the company's website.
"Fortress has instituted certain changes to the organizational structure of Vannin to take advantage of synergies with its own legal assets business," Fortress managing director Gordon Runté said in a statement Friday. "Vannin investment professionals based in Europe and Australia are active in the market and continue to source, originate and manage litigation finance opportunities across a broad spectrum of case types."
The September announcement of the sale came a year after Vannin scrapped plans for an IPO. New York-based Fortress, a subsidiary of the SoftBank Group, acquired 100% of the equity in Vannin from existing shareholders, including majority owner Bramden Investments, a private equity vehicle funded entirely by DLA Group, a family office based in the Isle of Man. The value of the deal was confidential.
At the time of the deal, Runté called the acquisition a "logical next step and natural fit for our business," adding that "it will complement the breadth of our relationships and leadership in the space."
But several weeks later, Debtwire reported that the deal was prompted by U.K.-based Vannin's financial distress, noting that before turning to Fortress, the company spent much of the summer looking to private equity firms for capital to keep it afloat. When these efforts failed, the company put its entire portfolio up for sale, with an initial asking price of $200 million, according to Debtwire. Vannin had initially sought to go public at a value of £1bn ($1.29 billion), and it then lowered its valuation to £600 to £700 million ($776 to $996 million) before shelving the initial public offering.
Fortress had made previous investments in litigation finance, putting $100 million into a new investment entity operated by Australia-based IMF Bentham in 2017. The company also functions as a direct lender, and the Debtwire report said that it had previously loaned money to Vannin, with more financing to be unlocked in the event of a successful IPO. The failure of the IPO then led to a cash crunch that limited Vannin's ability to make new deals.
Vannin made its first U.S. hire in Washington, D.C., in January 2016, bringing aboard an international arbitration specialist from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. It opened a New York office in August 2017 with three investment directors formerly of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Freshfields and Dentons. A year later, the company brought on former Bloomberg Law president Scott Mozarsky as regional managing director for North America.
Vannin launched in Germany in June 2018 with the hire of Theo Paeffgen, former CEO of FORIS AG, the first litigation funder to be established in that country.
Vannin has also seen exits in the U.K., notably Ania Farren, an international arbitration expert who left the partnership at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner to become a managing director in August 2018.
Vannin's chief executive Richard Hextall and finance chief David Collins had agreed to step down at the completion of the deal, according to the Financial Times. Altogether, Vannin's website listed 35 professionals a week after the deal was announced. That figure is now down to 16. Several sources said the company briefly stripped the website of all names in October before restoring them.
Fortress itself has a group of approximately one dozen individuals in the U.S. who do work in legal finance, either through lending money to other finance operations, or by lending directly to other law firms collateralized against their work in progress, according to a source familiar with the company's operations.
|Read More
Fortress Bets Bigger on Litigation Funding With Vannin Acquisition
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCovington, Steptoe Form New Groups Amid Demand in Regulatory, Enforcement Space
4 minute readConsumer Finance Law Enforcer Takes Private Practice Job at Morgan Lewis
With 'Fractional' C-Suite Advisers, Midsize Firms Balance Expertise With Expense
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250