Big Law Sees Increased Demand, Productivity Declines
Demand for large law firm legal services in the first three quarters of the year was at its highest level since the recession, but costs were up and overall productivity was down, according to a Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor Economic Index report.
November 04, 2019 at 01:00 PM
5 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com
The market for Big Law keeps getting stronger, but that doesn't mean it's more profitable.
According to a Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor Economic Index (PMI) report released Monday, demand for large law firm legal services in the first three quarters of the year was at its highest level since the recession and billable rates continue to rise. On the flip side, costs were up and overall productivity was down in the same period.
The report, which is a composite index derived from data collected from 160 major law firms in the U.S. and some international markets, gave the legal industry a score of 56, up three points from the previous quarter's rating. A rating of 65, according to the report, indicates "strong" firm market performance.
According to the report, demand for large law firm services rose 2.4% in the third quarter, putting demand 1% higher in 2019 compared with the first nine months of 2018.
"The large law firm market is seeing a second straight year of strong growth in both demand and rates," Mike Abbott, vice president of enterprise thought leadership and content strategy at Thomson Reuters, said in a statement. "The growth is fairly widespread across market segments, practice areas and geographies."
Broken up by segment, Am Law 50 firms saw a 2.3% demand growth in the third quarter, while firms in the bottom half of the Am Law 100 saw the largest growth, up 3%. Am Law Second Hundred firms were just behind at 2.6%.
Litigation had strong practice area demand growth at 2.1%, which was the highest growth it had seen during the third quarter in the last eight years, according to the report. Much of that growth was at Second Hundred firms, Thomson Reuters said, contributing to the productivity increase for that group.
Growth in litigation is an important "harbinger of things to come" when looking at overall industry growth, according to Joe Blackwood, a thought leadership analyst at Thomson Reuters with a focus on the legal market, and Bill Josten, strategic content manager for legal content at Thomson Reuters. Increased litigation work over seven of the previous eight quarters is noteworthy because growth in this practice area was previously stagnant since 2012, Josten said.
Most practice areas saw some level of demand growth in the third quarter. For instance, overall corporate work was up 4%, an increase of 1.6% year-to-date, according to Thomson Reuters. Real estate gained 3.5% in the third quarter, labor and employment was up 4.7% and bankruptcy saw a 3.2% increase—meaning there has been demand growth in all three practice areas year to date in 2019 compared with 2018.
Rising Expenses, Productivity Declines
Expenses are on the rise and threaten to erode some of the profitability fostered by increased demand. Expenses were up, from 3.4% in the second quarter, to 4.1% in the third quarter, which the report said is the highest expense growth level in three years.
"As macroeconomic uncertainties continue, it's important that firms remain vigilant about containing costs and hiring levels," Abbott said in a release.
A larger spend on recruiting and investment in technology were the two primary drivers of the increased overhead, according to Thomson Reuters officials.
Helping to mitigate expense costs were rising billing rates, which the market saw in the third quarter. Overall rates were up 3.7% in the third quarter, consistent with the 3.8% increase through 2019 thus far.
Meanwhile, law firm demand hasn't kept up with hiring, resulting in a small drop in overall productivity.
Broken into segments, Am Law 50 firms increased hiring 2.9% in the third quarter, but demand did not match the hiring rate and productivity slipped 2.2%.
"Firms try to hire several quarters or even years in advance of what demand might be," Josten said. "Many firms are trying to increase their leverage model and hire more associates to push work down to."
Blackwood said that the uptick in hiring is a trend since 2012 and is occurring mostly in the fifth- to eighth-year associate ranks. These associates churn out a lot of work and they are paid less than partners, usually making them very profitable for the firm, he noted.
In collections, firms saw a collected realization against worked rates of 89.6%, about the same as last year.
Cash collections were up 6.7%, which was a slight improvement over the 6% seen a year earlier.
Overall, Blackwood and Josten said the macro market was "strong" and that firms are in a position to make strategic investments. They said many firms are using this period to prepare for the looming economic downturn that is "historically, long overdue."
Read More:
Warning Signs: How Big Law's Greatest Failures Unfolded
How Do Midsize Firms Define a Good Year of Revenue Growth?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year' White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/03/Heather-McDevitt-767x633.jpg)
White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'
6 minute read![Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/11/67/f75a9f5d46b08088f1ca60a48425/karp-clement-barr-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
4 minute read![Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024 Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/01/Snapchat-App-004-767x633.jpg)
![Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/03/Jones-Day-sign-01-767x633.jpg)
Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250