LeClairRyan Owned Just 1% Of UnitedLex Joint Venture, Filing Says
In recent bankruptcy filings, LeClairRyan said it owned just 1% of its joint venture with UnitedLex and reported lower revenue numbers to the court than it reported to the press.
November 04, 2019 at 05:04 PM
4 minute read
Before it spiraled into bankruptcy, LeClairRyan touted its joint venture ULX Partners with alternative legal services provider UnitedLex as a gamechanger and part of its strategy to embody "law firm 2.0." As hundreds of LeClairRyan employees joined ULX, UnitedLex CEO Dan Reed called it "the most disruptive change to the practice and business of law since lawyers began billing their time."
But LeClairRyan was hardly an equal partner in the new venture. As it turns out, its stake in ULX was just 1%, according to a new bankruptcy filing in Virginia court.
It's not clear whether UnitedLex owned the remaining 99% of ULX or whether other investors had ownership stakes in the venture, which was designed to let participant law firms outsource non-legal operations. Emails to representatives of the company weren't returned Friday and Monday.
As the wind-down of the former Am Law 200 firm has moved forward since July, and especially after it filed for bankruptcy Sept. 3, more details have trickled out about its operations, assets and liabilities.
For instance, the firm reported revenues for 2017 and 2018 that are several million dollars lower than what it reported to The American Lawyer. In 2018, according to its bankruptcy papers, its legal services revenues totaled about $111.7 million, compared with $122.5 million reported to American Lawyer. The year before that, in 2017, legal services revenue totaled about $133.7 million, lower than the $142.2 million reported to The American Lawyer.
Gina Passarella, editor-in-chief of American Lawyer, said the publication relies on various sources of information to report law firm financial figures, including efforts to investigate red flags raised by data provided by the firms themselves. "In this instance, while directionally accurate, the gross revenue figures reported by the firm did not match what was reported to the court. It is always our goal to provide the most accurate, deeply reported information to our readers, and we will work even harder to ensure our reporting digs deeper and that our metrics are clearly defined," she said in a statement.
|Debt to ULX
In first-day filings, LeClairRyan said it owed $8 million plus interest to ULX under a deferred-fees agreement struck last year, secured by a second-priority lien on LeClairRyan's assets.
Filings in court Thursday contained still more details. The firm said it had at least $21 million in property, $17.5 million of which was accounts receivable, versus $16 million of secured claims and $42 million of unsecured claims, according to its schedules of assets and liabilities, a statement of financial affairs and a statement of equity security holders,
More than half of the secured claims—some $8.6 million—are held by ULX Partners. About $6.8 million is owed to ABL Alliance, a lender with a first-priority lien on LeClairRyan's assets.
In addition to its secured debt, ULX is also among the firm's largest unsecured creditors, owed $3.4 million in that category for unspecified services. Other large unsecured creditors include Gary LeClair, the firm's co-founder, whose $1.9 million claim of stock, interests and dividends is disputed; Proxios, an IT company, owed $1.3 million; K&L Gates, owed $787,666 for an unspecified "trade debt"; and landlords, including Latham & Watkins, which is owed $274,000. K&L Gates declined to comment on the nature of the debt.
LeClairRyan and UnitedLex worked together closely for years before they formed ULX in 2018. About 400 lawyers and support staff moved from LeClairRyan to UnitedLex in 2013, and about 300 more were "rebadged" as part of the creation of ULX. While Reed, UnitedLex's CEO, said he hoped to grow ULX to 10,000 employees in five years, sources told the American Lawyer that layoffs took place at ULX in October 2018.
Hunton Andrews Kurth continues to represent LeClairyRyan in its ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. The firm on Thursday sought court approval for $296,000 in fees. Hourly fees ranged from $427 for an associate admitted to the bar in 2015 to $883 for Tyler Brown, a partner who has spent more than 139 hours on the case, with a blended rate of $669 an hour.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Meet the Finalists: The American Lawyer's Young Lawyers of The Year
Trending Stories
- 1Florida Hurricane Relief—IRS Offers Extended Deadlines and Tax Benefits
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'When the Firm Needs Something Done, Raise Your Hand,' Says Eric Kennedy of Buchalter
- 3People in the News—Nov. 15, 2024—Lamb McErlane, Faye Riva, Stradley Ronon
- 4'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
- 5Federal Judge Finds Neiman Marcus Liable in Personal Injury Suit for Unsecured 13-Pound Painting
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250