LeClairRyan Owned Just 1% Of UnitedLex Joint Venture, Filing Says
In recent bankruptcy filings, LeClairRyan said it owned just 1% of its joint venture with UnitedLex and reported lower revenue numbers to the court than it reported to the press.
November 04, 2019 at 05:04 PM
4 minute read
Before it spiraled into bankruptcy, LeClairRyan touted its joint venture ULX Partners with alternative legal services provider UnitedLex as a gamechanger and part of its strategy to embody "law firm 2.0." As hundreds of LeClairRyan employees joined ULX, UnitedLex CEO Dan Reed called it "the most disruptive change to the practice and business of law since lawyers began billing their time."
But LeClairRyan was hardly an equal partner in the new venture. As it turns out, its stake in ULX was just 1%, according to a new bankruptcy filing in Virginia court.
It's not clear whether UnitedLex owned the remaining 99% of ULX or whether other investors had ownership stakes in the venture, which was designed to let participant law firms outsource non-legal operations. Emails to representatives of the company weren't returned Friday and Monday.
As the wind-down of the former Am Law 200 firm has moved forward since July, and especially after it filed for bankruptcy Sept. 3, more details have trickled out about its operations, assets and liabilities.
For instance, the firm reported revenues for 2017 and 2018 that are several million dollars lower than what it reported to The American Lawyer. In 2018, according to its bankruptcy papers, its legal services revenues totaled about $111.7 million, compared with $122.5 million reported to American Lawyer. The year before that, in 2017, legal services revenue totaled about $133.7 million, lower than the $142.2 million reported to The American Lawyer.
Gina Passarella, editor-in-chief of American Lawyer, said the publication relies on various sources of information to report law firm financial figures, including efforts to investigate red flags raised by data provided by the firms themselves. "In this instance, while directionally accurate, the gross revenue figures reported by the firm did not match what was reported to the court. It is always our goal to provide the most accurate, deeply reported information to our readers, and we will work even harder to ensure our reporting digs deeper and that our metrics are clearly defined," she said in a statement.
Debt to ULX
In first-day filings, LeClairRyan said it owed $8 million plus interest to ULX under a deferred-fees agreement struck last year, secured by a second-priority lien on LeClairRyan's assets.
Filings in court Thursday contained still more details. The firm said it had at least $21 million in property, $17.5 million of which was accounts receivable, versus $16 million of secured claims and $42 million of unsecured claims, according to its schedules of assets and liabilities, a statement of financial affairs and a statement of equity security holders,
More than half of the secured claims—some $8.6 million—are held by ULX Partners. About $6.8 million is owed to ABL Alliance, a lender with a first-priority lien on LeClairRyan's assets.
In addition to its secured debt, ULX is also among the firm's largest unsecured creditors, owed $3.4 million in that category for unspecified services. Other large unsecured creditors include Gary LeClair, the firm's co-founder, whose $1.9 million claim of stock, interests and dividends is disputed; Proxios, an IT company, owed $1.3 million; K&L Gates, owed $787,666 for an unspecified "trade debt"; and landlords, including Latham & Watkins, which is owed $274,000. K&L Gates declined to comment on the nature of the debt.
LeClairRyan and UnitedLex worked together closely for years before they formed ULX in 2018. About 400 lawyers and support staff moved from LeClairRyan to UnitedLex in 2013, and about 300 more were "rebadged" as part of the creation of ULX. While Reed, UnitedLex's CEO, said he hoped to grow ULX to 10,000 employees in five years, sources told the American Lawyer that layoffs took place at ULX in October 2018.
Hunton Andrews Kurth continues to represent LeClairyRyan in its ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. The firm on Thursday sought court approval for $296,000 in fees. Hourly fees ranged from $427 for an associate admitted to the bar in 2015 to $883 for Tyler Brown, a partner who has spent more than 139 hours on the case, with a blended rate of $669 an hour.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250