Quinn Emanuel Says Clients Can Pay in Bitcoin
The litigation megafirm says it considered the legal ethics implications of cryptocurrency payments before joining the small group of Am Law 200 firms that have taken the leap.
November 05, 2019 at 05:57 PM
4 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan said Tuesday that it has started accepting bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, joining a handful of other firms that have acknowledged their openness to the fledgling payment method.
The firm said it accepted its first cryptocurrency payment last week using BitPay, a Georgia-based bitcoin payment service. The firm did not name the client involved.
In a statement, founding partner John Quinn said that since Quinn Emanuel has several clients in the financial technology sector, it is comfortable adopting nontraditional payment.
"We want to be flexible for our clients. Bitcoin is an easy and secure way to transfer funds, and we embrace it," he said.
Quinn Emanuel is among just a few large law firms that have been public about accepting payment via cryptocurrency: Perkins Coie, Steptoe & Johnson LLP and Frost Brown Todd also accept bitcoin payments, and a slew of smaller firms as well as solo practitioners have embraced the payment structure.
Dave Grable, co-chairman of Quinn Emanuel's national trial practice group, said in an interview that the decision to start accepting cryptocurrency payments is in line with the 830-lawyer, litigation-only firm's overall appetite for innovation.
"This is another area where we've looked at the market use of blockchain and cryptocurrency," he said. "This is something we certainly wanted to be able to do for clients who want to do transactions this way, and we were comfortable with the transparency and security of the process."
Grable said the firm as a whole has handled many matters in the fintech space, and he sees an opportunity especially with younger technology companies that are embracing cryptocurrency in various parts of their business models.
"[Clients] associated in that space are going to have some desire to consider an option like this," he said.
Blockchain and cryptocurrency have been a hot topic in the legal industry for years, with many firms establishing practices to advise clients on the technologies. But some experts have questioned whether accepting bitcoin as payment for legal services raises ethical issues.
Mark Palmer, chief counsel for the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism, wrote in 2018 that cryptocurrency payments presented a challenge for the legal industry because of volatile valuations that could lead to unethical overpayment for services.
"Does the cost, complexity and risk outweigh the potential benefits of your firm accepting this novel and quickly evolving form of compensation?" he wrote. "Like most things, it comes down to a business decision for you to make while ensuring you do so ethically under your Rules of Professional Conduct."
John Reed Stark, president of John Reed Stark Consulting and a former chief of the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission's Office of Internet Enforcement, took a more hard-line approach in 2018. After outlining some of the potential benefits of accepting cryptocurrency—business development, client relations and legal education—he concluded that they don't outweigh the costs.
"But having said all of the above, the risks for a law firm that accepts cryptocurrency run a perilous gamut of legal, regulatory, financial, ethical and reputational dangers," he wrote. "Simply stated, accepting cryptocurrency as a fee payment in today's crypto-manic environment is, despite all of the bus dev allure, just not worth it."
Palmer and Stark were not immediately available to comment.
Grable said the firm weighed the ethical considerations of accepting bitcoin payments before making its decision, and that's partly what led the firm to BitPay, a cryptocurrency payment service provider, to facilitate handling the payments.
"We recognize there's volatility involved, and the BitPay service will help in that regard," he said. "We're comfortable with how we've addressed the volatility issues."
Herrick Lidstone, a shareholder at Burns, Figa & Will and an adjunct professor at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law, co-authored an academic paper last year that explored the ethics and practicality of cryptocurrency payments. He said in an email that as long as law firms stay in accordance with the rules, it is their choice to explore cryptocurrency payments.
"As the article said, there are a number of ways to do it, some correctly, too many incorrectly," he said. "With Quinn Emanuel's sophistication and experience, I expect them to do it correctly."
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCovington, Steptoe Form New Groups Amid Demand in Regulatory, Enforcement Space
4 minute readConsumer Finance Law Enforcer Takes Private Practice Job at Morgan Lewis
With 'Fractional' C-Suite Advisers, Midsize Firms Balance Expertise With Expense
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250