A Firm Implemented a 4-Day Workweek and Hasn't Looked Back
The shorter workweek is getting another look following a report by Microsoft Japan that found productivity jumped 40% after the company switched to a four-day week.
November 07, 2019 at 05:21 PM
6 minute read
Walter Benenati, managing partner and founder of Orlando, Florida-based Benenati Law, kicked off 2019 by shortening the workweek at his 24-employee firm to four days.
He regards it as one of the best decisions of his life. Fridays are spent with his family, taking his 3-year-old daughter to gymnastics and cooking a late brunch. His employees use Fridays to run errands and go to doctor appointments they previously had to either squeeze into the workday or take a precious day off.
The four-day workweek is getting another look following news that Microsoft reported a 40% increase in productivity after the company instituted the abbreviated week in a trial project. The shortened week is also getting a nod from the United Kingdom's Labour Party, which has absorbed the policy into its political platform.
Like Microsoft, Benenati has seen positive results from his shortened workweek. The personal injury and bankruptcy lawyer says he is as competitive as they come—a necessity because personal injury giant Morgan & Morgan is based in the same city. But the firm has not suffered as a result of the shortened week. Monthly retention numbers haven't dropped, and office morale and productivity are up, he said.
"I always want to be the one getting all the business, but I realized it's so important to be able to pick up your kid and see your wife on Friday," Benenati said. "Productivity is better because everything needs to be done by Thursday and people are fully refreshed after a three-day weekend."
The firm's employees do not work fewer hours per week than they would if they worked five days. Its five attorneys, as well as 14 of its 19 staff, work 10-hour days instead of the typical eight, starting at 8 a.m. and ending at 6 p.m., to ensure billing doesn't drop and "everybody still gets their 40 hours," Benenati said.
Four staff members and one case manager work the traditional five-day week because they preferred to work until 5 p.m., Benenati said. And every Friday, one attorney is rotated in to field any consultations or incoming work.
To be sure, large firms may not have the same level of flexibility as Benenati's firm to implement an abbreviated week, and experts see little chance of a four-day week becoming the legal-industry standard. But a shortened week does address some of the biggest mental health and morale challenges law firm employees face.
Chief among these is the stigma surrounding taking time off. Vacation time, flexible work hours and paid parental leave have become near-standard as firms have looked to recruit top-flight young talent and retain women attorneys. But these resources often go untapped, said Lauren Rikleen, president of the Rikleen Institute for Strategic Leadership.
"One of the biggest problems right now with the way flexibility is provided in the profession is that it always comes with a stigma attached," Rikleen said. "We live in a world where flexibility is a lot easier to implement than people feel it is, yet we still hear issues around the stigma concern that comes with it."
In most work environments, attorneys who have a flexible schedule size up their workload by comparing it with colleagues who work a different schedule. But an environment in which people have a uniform day and an abridged week eliminates the comparison and weakens the stigma, she said.
"We know that there's no one-size-fits-all but the intriguing thing about this model is that it reduces the one barrier of flexible scheduling because everybody has this schedule and nobody is seen as less committed for not participating," Rikleen said.
Debbie Epstein Henry, a legal consultant and co-founder of Bliss Lawyers, finds the Friday rotational schedule implemented by Benenati intriguing. For years, Henry has argued that attorneys should be more open to "job shares"—a work scheme standard among doctors as well as in-house, not-for-profit and government attorneys.
Employing a job share schedule in which two attorneys are up-to-speed on the same matters and fill in for each other allows attorneys to enjoy their vacation or parental leave without guilt and the need to constantly check phones and emails—a much-maligned aspect of the job that Henry refers to as the inability to go "off call."
"Attorneys used to go to the ends of the earth where they couldn't get cell-service to finally be able to unplug," Henry said. "Cell service is too good now, and there needs to be an effective mechanism to allow attorneys to be off call."
Henry said job-sharing arrangements are even easier at big law firms, as such firms already staff multiple attorneys on matters. Under job sharing, two mid-level associates would be assigned to the same big case and both would be tasked with consuming and memorizing the relevant facts and case law. They would both be copied on all the emails and they would attend the same meetings.
When one of the associates needs to go on vacation, having the other fill in allows the attorney to enjoy the time away and take time off guilt-free, as both attorneys are already caught up on the case. This idea, Henry believes, can be applied to almost any employment situation.
Naysayers are likely to insist that the practice of law is unique and these work arrangements cannot work the way they do in other businesses. But Henry doesn't buy that argument.
"If it works for matters of life and death, as with doctors and nurses, why wouldn't it work for attorneys?" she said.
But, again, nobody has illusions of widespread adoption of a four-day week in the legal profession, regardless of its merits.
"Law firms aren't going to be trailblazers," said Nathan Peart, a consultant at Major, Lindsey & Africa. "Look at how long diversity is taking, even though there's client backing for it."
Peart said flexible scheduling is a great thing for lawyers, but he says that flexibility should lie with the individual, not the firm. He also noted that Microsoft Japan's policy relied heavily on better technology and efficiency practices that can be adopted by firms without going to a four-day week—keeping meetings to less than 30 minutes, for example.
"Maybe not everybody would want Friday off. Maybe Wednesday or Monday would be better for some," Peart said. "Investing more in technology and group cooperation and policies could achieve the same results."
|Similar Stories:
Do Associate Perks Make a Difference in the Law Firm Talent War?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250