Scott Edelman, chairman of MilbankMilbank Becomes First Mover With Early Associate Bonus Announcement
The firm's announcement kicks off Big Law associate bonus season, coming even a week before Cravath's uncharacteristically early announcement last year.
November 07, 2019 at 04:13 PM
2 minute read
Milbank said Thursday that its first-year associates are taking home a $15,000 year-end bonus while senior associates receive up to a $100,000 bonus.
The bonuses sit on the same pay scale announced by Cravath, Swaine & Moore in November 2018, according to a memo obtained by The American Lawyer.
Milbank's announcement kicks off Big Law associate bonus season, coming even a week before Cravath's uncharacteristically early announcement Nov. 19, 2018. Above the Law first reported the Milbank bonuses Thursday.
Milbank was also the first mover last year in raising associate salaries, setting the bar for other big law firms last summer by increasing their first-year associate salaries to $190,000. Cravath soon after matched the first-year salaries but raised the salary scale for mid-level and senior associates.
Milbank's timing was not lost on many legal market observers. "The timing is sort of surprising," said Nathan Peart, the managing director of Major, Lindsey & Africa's associate practice group. "Obviously, there's a war on talent. Firms want to be seen as an early leader in setting market rates, and it shows they feel confident in the market next year."
According to the Milbank memo signed by chairman Scott Edelman, bonuses will be paid out to "associates in good standing" on or before Dec. 31. The firm will prorate the bonus on the basis of "start dates, part-time schedule and unpaid leaves of absence."
"I sincerely thank you for your many efforts during what has been a very busy year and looks to be a busy year-end. Your commitment to excellent client service, diversity, mentoring, pro bono and recruiting is critical to the firm's success," Edelman wrote.
Here is the full bonus scale announced Thursday by Milbank:
- Class of 2019 — $15,000
- Class of 2018 — $15,000
- Class of 2017 — $25,000
- Class of 2016 — $50,000
- Class of 2015 — $65,000
- Class of 2014 — $80,000
- Class of 2013 — $90,000
- Class of 2012 — $100,000
- Class of 2011 — $100,000
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute read
Legal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute read
As Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
