Cravath Matches Associate Bonuses After Early Announcement From Milbank
The firm matched Milbank's bonuses, which are identical to those provided last year. First-year associates will be paid $15,000 while senior associates will take home up to $100,000.
November 11, 2019 at 05:05 PM
2 minute read
Cravath, Swaine & Moore announced its associate year-end bonuses on Monday, just a few days after Milbank made its uncharacteristically early associate bonus announcement.
Cravath's bonuses are the same as last year's and are identical to the bonuses Milbank announced last week. First-year associates will be paid $15,000 while senior associates will take home up to $100,000, according to an internal memo obtained by Above the Law, which first reported the Cravath bonuses.
A representative for Cravath said the firm does not comment on compensation matters.
Last year Cravath was the first mover on associate bonuses, announcing them on Nov. 19. But Milbank beat out Cravath when it announced last Thursday. Milbank was also the first to announce a $10,000 associate salary raise last year, which Cravath quickly matched for first-year associates and raised for midlevel and senior associates.
Legal experts speculated that Milbank's early announcement demonstrates just how competitive the market for top talent has become. Announcing early signals to the market that the firm is in good financial health and boosts name recognition among law school students, although many criticized the salary arms race as detrimental to firm profits and clients.
But that trend is likely to continue, Zeughauser Group consultant Kent Zimmermann has said.
"The market for sought-after talent is more competitive than ever and that causes firms to look for an advantage wherever they can find it," Zimmermann told The American Lawyer last week when Milbank announced its bonuses. "I would not be surprised if the date moves up more."
Here is the full bonus scale announced Monday by Cravath:
- Class of 2019 — $15,000
- Class of 2018 — $15,000
- Class of 2017 — $25,000
- Class of 2016 — $50,000
- Class of 2015 — $65,000
- Class of 2014 — $80,000
- Class of 2013 — $90,000
- Class of 2012 — $100,000
- Class of 2011 — $100,000
Similar Stories:
Milbank Becomes First Mover With Early Associate Bonus Announcement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Elaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
- 2How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 3When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 4New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
- 5'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250