Law Firm Revenues Rise as Demand Accelerates, Citi Reports
The first nine months of 2019 saw 5.1% revenue growth for a sample of 190 law firms.
November 12, 2019 at 05:30 AM
7 minute read
There is a lot of good news in the nine-month 2019 industry results. While we might not end the year with the strong growth levels seen in 2018, we anticipate that 2019 will be a decent year. For the first time this year, revenue growth exceeded expense growth. Rate increases continued to be strong, while demand growth continued to accelerate. The collection cycle continued to lengthen, hurting revenue, but strong inventory growth places the industry in a solid position to end the year well.
These results are based on a sample of 190 firms (76 Am Law 100 firms, 54 Second Hundred firms and 60 niche/boutique firms). Thirty-one of these firms fit our definition of either international (less than 25% but more than 10% of lawyers based outside the United States) or global (at least 25% of lawyers based outside the United States). Citi Private Bank provides financial services to more than 700 U.S. and U.K. law firms and more than 50,000 individual lawyers. Each quarter, the Law Firm Group confidentially surveys firms in the Am Law 100 and the Second Hundred, along with smaller firms. In addition, we conduct a more detailed annual survey and semiannually produce the Law Firm Leaders Confidence Index. These reports, together with extensive discussions with law firm leaders, provide a comprehensive overview of current financial trends in the industry, as well as forward-looking insight.
Revenue growth of 5.1% for the first nine months of 2019 was driven largely by lawyer billing rate growth of 4.7%, as demand grew 0.9%. Each of these metrics saw accelerated growth from the first-half industry results. Indeed, demand growth accelerated from just 0.1% growth during the first six months, and this continued improvement in the demand environment mirrors what we had been hearing throughout the third quarter from our clients. The one metric that continued to hurt revenue growth was the 1.5% lengthening of the collection cycle. While this is slightly less than the 1.6% lengthening we reported during the first half, this is a continuation of a prolonged trend, and is largely driven by clients taking longer to pay bills. Looking toward what might be possible for full-year revenue growth results, inventory growth was strong at 6.7% and should continue to provide collections momentum into the fourth quarter.
Expenses were up 4.7% for the first nine months, moderating from the 5.9% growth we reported for the first half. One of the positive stories of 2019 has been the moderation of expense growth since the first quarter, as the industry absorbed the impact of the mid-2018 associate salary increases. Indeed, lawyer compensation growth moderated from 7.3% for the first half to 5.3% for the first nine months—and that is with 2% growth in lawyer head count. Operating expense growth of 4.3% was also a better result than the 4.8% growth reported for the first half. On another positive note, for the first time this year, revenue growth outpaced expense growth, removing the margin pressure seen throughout the first half of this year.
With 2% growth in total lawyer head count, and just 0.3% increase in the equity partnership, lawyer leverage was up by 2.4%. Even with an improved demand environment, we saw average lawyer productivity continue to trail 2018 results, down 0.7%. While the productivity dip has been moderating as this year has progressed, firms continue to operate in an environment where they are paying more for lower productivity.
Behind these averages, we saw some improvement from the even dispersion in demand performance we reported during the first half. That said, at 46% of firms seeing a demand decline during the first nine months of 2019, it remains a challenging environment for many firms. We also saw less volatility in demand performance, defined as alternating periods of demand growth and decline, than we saw in the first-half numbers. To measure volatility, we looked at the 146 firms reporting nine-month results in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Approximately 38% of these firms saw demand increase in the first nine months of 2018 and decrease in the first nine months of 2019, or vice versa—far lower than the 51% we reported experiencing volatility in the first-half results.
Looking at the results by revenue size, Am Law 51-100 firms continued to outperform other segments in revenue and demand growth, up 5.8% and 1.8%, respectively. While the collection cycle lengthened for these firms, Am Law 51-100 firms also had the highest inventory growth (at 7.5%), setting them up well for a strong end to the year. Am Law 1-50 firms may have trailed Am Law 51-100 firms in demand growth, but in another positive trend this year, we have seen demand performance for these firms continue to improve throughout the year, up 0.8% for the first nine months—much better than the 0.7% decline we saw during the first quarter. Am Law 1-50 rate increases continued to outpace other segments, up 5.2%, helping to drive the 5.4% growth in revenue (second only to the Am Law 51-100 firms), and in spite of the 1.6% lengthening of the collection cycle. With strong inventory levels (up 7.1%) for Am Law 1-50 firms, the outlook for the rest of the year is very positive.
The smaller firms in our sample (Am Law Second Hundred firms and Other firms) also saw improved performance in the nine-month results, though they continue to trail Am Law 100 firms in terms of revenue, rate and inventory growth. For Second Hundred firms, it is worth noting that their demand growth for the first nine months slightly outpaced Am Law 1-50 firms, at 0.9% growth.
Looking at firms by geographic reach, global firms saw the greatest growth in demand (up 2.5%) and revenue (up 6.4%). There is still some margin pressure, with expense growth of 6.5%. However, global firms also carry a 6.6% inventory increase into the fourth quarter, signaling strong collections ahead. International firms saw the greatest rate increases, at 5.9%, and positive demand momentum, reporting 0.3% growth after seeing a 0.9% decline during the first half. Revenue grew 5.1%, muted by a 2.8% lengthening of the collection cycle. The good news is that these international firms also saw an easing of the margin pressure we reported in the six-month results. They also ended the nine-month period with 8.1% inventory growth, the highest of all segments, setting them up for a strong end to 2019.
National firms saw solid revenue growth (5.6%), driven by a combination of 1.4% demand growth and 3.8% rate increases. Inventory growth of 5.9% signals a strong year-end.
Regional firms were the only segment to continue to see a demand decline, though it moderated from the 1.3% decline reported for the first half, to 0.5% decline for the nine-month period. Revenue growth of 3.5% trailed all segments, far below the 4.2% growth in expenses. Looking ahead, 6.2% growth in inventory means that there is opportunity for these firms to see a decent end to the year.
While the first nine months of 2019 saw slower revenue growth than we saw through the same period in 2018, there are several positive trends in the results. Demand growth continued to gain momentum. Rate growth has been strong. Expense pressure has moderated, easing margin pressure. Dispersion and volatility remain, but are less acute than we saw earlier in the year. Looking ahead, inventory levels are high. The biggest challenge to a strong year-end is the continued lengthening of the collection cycle. If firms are able to collect on strong inventory levels, 2019 should end well.
Gretta Rusanow is head of advisory services within Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Rethink Everything' or 'Optimize What's Working'? The Right Law Firm Strategy
7 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Trending Stories
- 1AG Had No Authority to Take Control of Paterson PD, Appellate Division Says
- 2Deviation From Shared Custody Guidelines Requires More Than Common Sense
- 3Florida Pursues New Charge Against Trump Assassination Suspect
- 4Telefónica Maintains State Court Win in $623M Failed Merger Dispute
- 5‘Badge of Honor’: SEC Targets CyberKongz in Token Registration Dispute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250