Former LeClairRyan Shareholder Can Collect $1 Million From Firm's Insurance
Michele Craddock sued LeClairRyan for gender discrimination and won more than $1 million in arbitration. Then the firm collapsed.
November 19, 2019 at 06:44 PM
3 minute read
A former LeClairRyan shareholder has been given the green light by a federal bankruptcy judge to begin collecting the nearly $1 million she won when she sued the now-shuttered law firm for gender discrimination.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Huennekens of the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that Michele Craddock can collect the money from the bankrupt firm, where she worked for 12 years until she was allegedly forced out in 2015 by discriminatory compensation practices. This includes trying to collect from LeClairRyan's insurance, Huennekens ruled.
If Craddock is unable to collect from the full amount "from sources other than property of the estate," she'll become a creditor in the LeClairRyan bankruptcy, Huennekens determined. Lynn Tavenner, the Tavenner & Beran attorney who is the Chapter 7 trustee of LeClairRyan's estate, offered no objection to Craddock's motion to collect that money.
"We were, obviously, very pleased," said Michael Wilson, Craddock's attorney in the bankruptcy proceedings. "The order was essentially conceded by [LeClairRyan]'s Chapter 7 trustee, and she also provided some input into the language in the order."
An arbitration panel had awarded Craddock $1.021 million in October 2018—that amount included back pay, compensatory damages for emotional distress and attorney fees, plus interest. LeClairRyan only challenged parts of the arbitration award before U.S. District Judge Robert Payne of the Eastern District of Virginia, meaning Craddock was free to collect $885,779.84, Wilson argued in a Sept. 18 filing.
Because of interest, Craddock is due nearly $1 million, with $395,000 going to her and $598,000 going to her lawyers in that litigation, Wilson said.
"We have not had significant pushback from the insurer, rather just requests to provide all of the necessary information and copies of the relevant orders and the AAA award," Wilson said.
LeClairRyan had challenged the fee enhancement the arbitration panel had awarded to Craddock's attorneys at Butler Royals. Payne agreed, vacating a portion of the panel's award and remanding it back to them so they can recalculate the attorney fees.
Payne's ruling came in June. Less than two months later, LeClairRyan announced it was dissolving. The arbitration panel hadn't completed its work on the revised award yet when LeClairRyan filed for bankruptcy.
Although an automatic stay was entered in the case, the panel completed its work on the revised arbitration award and submitted it in mid-September, Wilson said. Right now the revised award "stands and is enforceable," Wilson said, although he noted that Tavenner could move to have it voided.
Wilson signaled Tavenner doesn't care about that particular detail as Craddock is looking to have her claim covered by OneBeacon Insurance Group, LeClairRyan's insurer. If the firm's insurance can't cover it all, Craddock would pursue the remaining amount through the normal claims resolution process in the bankruptcy case, Wilson said.
"The Chapter 7 trustee is not going to go back and relitigate Michele's claim," Wilson said.
Craddock works with her husband John, also a former LeClairRyan attorney, at their own law firm in Richmond, Virginia.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Want to Leave a Mark': What We Learned From This Year's Industry Awards Winners
New Year Brings New Partner Hires for White & Case, Venable, Winston & Strawn
3 minute readTopping Kirkland, Weil Won the Most Valuable Major Bankruptcy Retentions of 2024
Trending Stories
- 1Chair of Montgomery McCracken Decamps for Morgan Lewis
- 2You Too Can Be a Programmer: Connecting to Legal Platform APIs With Generative AI (Part 2)
- 3Court of Appeals and Appellate Division As Courts of First Instance
- 4Federal Judge Slaps Down the SEC’s Attempt to Regulate Crypto Liquidity Providers
- 5A Client Is Guilty; But Another Man Is Wrongfully Convicted
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250