Seyfarth Takes On New Moniker, New Look
Seyfarth Shaw—just call it Seyfarth—is the latest firm to update its image and streamline its shingle as the Am Law 100 rebranding craze continues.
November 20, 2019 at 05:58 PM
4 minute read
Milbank. Mintz. Katten. Bartlit Beck. There has been no shortage of rebrandings in the legal industry lately, including revamped law firm logos, new websites and a continuing trend toward shorter firm names. Chicago-founded Seyfarth Shaw—newly branded as simply Seyfarth—is the latest Am Law 100 firm to update its image and streamline its shingle.
"Our new brand and website proudly capture the collective culture and energy of Seyfarth, while showcasing the leadership and diversity of our teams," Dawn Orel, Seyfarth's chief marketing and business development officer, said in a statement. "It reflects who we are today, and where we want to go in the future."
The American Lawyer caught up with Molly Porter, Seyfarth's director of marketing and one of the primary architects behind the firm's makeover, to discuss how and why the rebrand came about, what the firm hopes to accomplish through the effort, and why it seems there have been so many firms looking to sharpen their image lately.
This conversation has been edited for clarity and length.
What was the impetus for the rebrand? Why now?
We started this process a couple of years ago. You need a lot of lead time. Developing a case and finding a provider takes time. A lot of things can drive the need for a rebrand. Ours was the story. The firm had grown from us being a U.S.- based labor and employment firm to being an international, full service firm. I heard on multiple occasions that our website, for example, did not reflect that.
What sort of process did you go through for the rebrand? Who was involved?
We established the brand and digital groups: about 50 people from across the firm, representatives from every legal services department, office managing partners and executive committee members. We wanted to make sure that from the beginning we had the right voices at the table. These groups played a signature role. They were able to bring in points of view where we were able to understand issues in each marketplace and use that as sort of a 'sensible practice' for how we move forward.
We began with the end in mind. We feel that within the firm our people are our biggest stakeholders. We want the people that work here to be attached to the brand and have it resonate with them. What do we want those people to hear and see? Experience? That was a significant piece of work. Brand you can work on with an agency. But the ground game (rallying your internal people to buy into the change) is on you and the people in your firm.
Also, we knew we wanted to keep it under wraps for as long as we could—have this big unveiling. But we also knew we had to bring people in to see it, so ultimately we decided to have an unveiling at the partner meeting in September of this year. The response from the partnership was really positive.
It seems there have been a lot of law firm rebrands recently. Why do you think that is?
I've been doing work for law firms since 2003, and it is cyclical, where you get a burst of activity. That could be one reason. Also, I think it reflects the importance of brand to law firms. As they become more sophisticated with their marketing efforts, their desire to invest in something to help them stand out from the sea of sameness is stronger.
Read More
Katten Jumps on Rebranding Bandwagon With New Image, Website
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readLosses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250