Law Firms' Unpaid Bills Are Piling Up. No Reason to Worry—Yet
Firms are sitting on a bigger pile of unpaid bills this year, due to more work and slower payments from clients.
December 02, 2019 at 05:00 AM
5 minute read
How bad will the collections crunch be this year? Inventory is up, clients are taking longer to pay bills, and the coming weeks will be a critical time for law firms to turn client bills into cash.
Law firms are sitting on a growing pile of bills they haven't sent out or their clients haven't paid yet, but financial observers and at least one law firm leader said this kind of behavior isn't causing alarm bells to go off—yet.
The law firms surveyed by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group and Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group reported that their inventories of unpaid bills have grown by 6.7% and 9%, respectively, compared with last year, in the first nine months of 2019.
"It's tricky," said Joe Mendola, senior director of sales at Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group. "You can have inventory going up because firms are extremely busy. It doesn't always necessarily mean slow pay, but I think in this period, I think it's a combination of both."
Citi found that law firms are taking longer to send out the bill and to get paid by their clients. Across the U.S., the amount of time that has elapsed between law firms first recording their billable hours to getting paid has increased by 1.5%, according to Citi.
But in Washington, D.C. and southern California, that period has increased by 4.7% and 3.3%, respectively, said Gretta Rusanow, the head of advisory services within Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group. As a result, the inventories for law firms in those areas grew 8%.
Even with these higher inventories, no one is panicking just yet. Both Mendola and Rusanow said the fourth quarter of any year is a major collection period for law firms, with Mendola noting that 30% to 35% of a firm's annual revenue might come in during the last three months of the year.
"The message we've been conveying is, it's an opportunity for firms to really focus on what is traditionally the strongest collection quarter of the year," Rusanow said. "There are firms that see a large portion of their revenue growth come in just the last few days of the calendar year."
Am Law 200 firm Dinsmore & Shohl is one of the many firms seeing an increase in inventory.
The inventory of unpaid legal bills has grown for the Cincinnati-based firm over the past 12 to 16 months, said Robert Lucas, the managing partner of the firm's Chicago office. While the firm's average collection time from clients has dropped, it's had to cajole some partners to ensure they're actually billing their clients as they work, he said.
"It's more, for us, staying on top of it and making sure any increases in our inventory are due to the fact that we are very productive and billing more time," Lucas said, who added that inventory rates can also adjust if a law firm has increased its billing rates.
|Slower Payments
One factor in the high inventory rate and the lengthening collection cycle is the time it takes clients to pay their bills. Rusanow and Mendola both said clients are taking longer to pay bills, with Rusanow describing how a 30-day pay cycle might become a 45 or 60-day pay cycle.
But partners feel like they can only do so much because the law is a relationship-heavy business, said Jay Benegal, senior vice president and legal industry specialist at Citizens Commercial Banking, a lender to large and midsize law firms.
"It's difficult for partners to chase down these clients for payment because they want to protect the relationship," Benegal said. "So they tread very carefully around the collections process, to the point where partners don't want to engage clients on the collections effort."
Benegal doesn't believe client behavior in stalling payments can be attributed to fears about a pending recession. Instead, it seems their business cycles have slowed down, which in turn leads to them paying their vendors—including their legal counsels—later, Benegal said. This slowdown is not isolated to any one sector or industry, he added.
It also might not be deliberate on the client's part. A lot of businesses use electronic billing systems, which might reject a legal bill from a law firm if it's not properly coded, Lucas and Rusanow said.
"You have to make sure all of your I's are dotted and all of your T's are crossed," Lucas said. "There can be a number of things that can contribute to a slower collection."
|Read More
A 'Very, Very Good Year' for Law Firms? Maybe So, but Not for Everyone
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElite Boutiques Competing More With Big Law Bonuses, With Several Going Above Market
9 minute readAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1State High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage
- 2Remote Proceedings: A Gift for the Holidays
- 3Contested Engineer Cleared to Testify in Defective Pistol Suit, Federal Judge Rules
- 4How I Made Partner: 'Don’t Be Scared to Be Ambitious,' Says Aya Eguchi of Morrison Foerster
- 5People in the News—Dec. 18, 2024—Faegre Drinker, Antheil Maslow
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250