Cleveland's Ulmer & Berne to Absorb Litigation Boutique, East Coast Offices
The combination of two Midwestern-headquartered firms will give Ulmer & Berne access to the New York and Washington markets.
December 03, 2019 at 03:24 PM
3 minute read
Cleveland-based midsize firm Ulmer & Berne will combine with Midwestern boutique Kaufman & Co. next year to expand its trial expertise, the firm announced Tuesday.
All 10 of Kaufman & Co.'s attorneys will be joining Ulmer, including four partners, four of counsel and two associates, when the merger takes effect Jan. 1. The move will also expand Ulmer's presence on the East Coast, as Kaufman & Co. has offices in Washington, D.C., and New York.
Scott Kadish, Ulmer's managing partner, said in an interview that since Ulmer was a litigation-dominated firm with a national presence, the opportunity to add the Kaufman & Co. team was once-in-a-lifetime.
"This is the kind of opportunity you don't pass by," he said, praising Kaufman & Co.'s high-profile litigation practice, led by firm founder Steven Kaufman. Kaufman will work closely with Michael Ungar, who chairs Ulmer's litigation department, he said.
Kadish added that the Kaufman & Co. attorneys will bring more first-chair trial expertise to Ulmer.
"Lots of firms have litigators," Kadish said. "We really pride ourselves in having a really good roster of trial attorneys."
Since Kadish was named Ulmer's managing partner four years ago, the firm has seen measured growth: its lawyer head count rose from 150 in 2015 to 161 last year, according to ALM data, and the firm ranked 250th on the 2019 NLJ 500 list of largest law firms by head count.
Kadish described the firm's growth as targeted.
"We wanted to be strategic about it, not just adding people for the sake of adding people," he said, explaining that Ulmer specifically sought trial attorneys to support its litigation practice, though the additions will be an asset to other practice groups and existing clients. Ulmer has existing clients in New York and New Jersey, and, Kadish added, having a New York presence creates additional opportunities to grow in the health care and pharmaceutical litigation spaces.
"We weren't particularly looking to open a New York office, but when this opportunity arose, we realized it would provide additional services for our clients," he said. "We like the Midwest, but we don't want to be geographically limited."
The firm's new Washington office will provide opportunities specifically for David Leopold, chair of the immigration law group, Kadish said, as well as the firm's national intellectual property practice.
Ulmer's leadership also wants the firm to grow outside New York and Washington in the next year, mainly targeting Midwestern markets such as Chicago, Kadish said. He said he prefers larger transactions such as mergers because lateral hires represent a slower growth strategy. While combinations present the challenge of finding the right match, he said Ulmer already has several firms in its sights that might make a good fit in the near future.
"We like the Midwest because that's who we are," he said. "We think our Midwestern roots—including our Midwestern rates and our Midwestern work ethic—give us a competitive advantage."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPolsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 2Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 3FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
- 4'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
- 5Court rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250