Sidley Austin Vows to Fight Claims It Aided $1.3B Ponzi Scheme
"We believe the claims asserted against the firm and Mr. Sullivan are without merit, and we intend to defend the case vigorously," a spokesman for Sidley said.
December 03, 2019 at 06:42 PM
4 minute read
Sidley Austin on Tuesday vowed to fight claims that it, along with 18 other lawyers and law firms, helped to perpetuate a $1.3 billion Ponzi scheme that swindled money out of thousands of investors.
According to a $500 million lawsuit filed by the receiver who is representing the investors, Sidley and one of its attorneys, Neal Sullivan, were "heavily involved" in the legal matters of Woodbridge Group of Cos., which was led by California executive and incarcerated mastermind Robert Shapiro.
"We believe the claims asserted against the firm and Mr. Sullivan are without merit, and we intend to defend the case vigorously," a spokesman for Sidley said. Sullivan is a Washington, D.C., partner and the global leader of Sidley's regulatory and enforcement practice.
Shapiro pleaded guilty to mail and wire fraud conspiracy and income tax evasion and was sentenced to 25 years in prison in October.
Shapiro promised investors they would profit from placing money in low-risk, high-interest loans that were issued on real estate owned by third parties. But that real estate either didn't exist or was secretly owned by Shapiro. Shapiro also siphoned off millions of dollars for his personal use.
According to the lawsuit filed by Michael Goldberg, an Akerman partner who is the receiver of the Woodbridge Liquidation Trust, Sidley and other law firms allegedly helped perpetuate Shapiro's Ponzi scheme by preparing documents that continued the fraud.
"The law firms and attorneys that are defendants in this complaint aided and abetted numerous securities violations and fraudulent acts," wrote Goldberg's lawyers in the complaint filed Tuesday in Superior Court in Los Angeles. "Some drafted offering documents replete with false statements that they knew were false. Some prepared negligent legal opinion memorandums to be shared with investors. Some assisted Shapiro in concealing his fraud."
In one instance in 2015, Sidley allegedly prepared a legal opinion that Woodbridge then used to assure people their investments in the company were legally sound. Goldberg alleged that Sidley knew or should have known that its conclusions in that opinion were heavily contested by state regulators who were probing whether Woodbridge was a Ponzi scheme.
Apart from Sidley, the other law firms who were named in Goldberg's 262-page, 62-claim lawsuit include Davis Graham & Stubbs; Halloran & Sage; Balcomb & Green; Rome McGuigan; Bailey Cavalieri; Robinson & Cole; Finn Dixon & Herling; and Haight Brown & Bonesteel, along with lawyers at those firms. Those other firms and lawyers did not respond to requests for comment as of press time.
"We're trying to pick up the pieces for these people and help them recover their massive—and tragic—losses," said Louis Miller, a partner at Miller Barondess who is representing Goldberg, in a statement. "We look forward to facing the defendants in a court of law and holding them responsible for the devastating losses they helped cause."
Correction: An earlier version of this story misidentified the California court where Tuesday's complaint was filed.
|Read More
CEO Sentenced to 25 Years for Leading $1.3 Billion Real Estate Ponzi Scheme
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1$83M Verdict After $100K Demand Rejected in Henry County
- 2Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
- 3How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 5Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250