Wilkinson Walsh Tops Big Law Associate Bonus Scale—Again
The high-end boutique, founded by former Big Law partners, has out-paid their former employers since the firm began in 2016.
December 09, 2019 at 04:40 PM
3 minute read
Associates at the nearly four-year-old trial litigation boutique Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz will take home larger bonuses than their Big Law counterparts, as high-end litigation boutiques look to compete with Big Law for top talent.
This marks the fourth year in which the firm has exceeded the standard rate paid by Big Law.
Founding member and managing partner Brant Bishop announced to the firm Dec. 5 that first-year associates will be paid bonuses of $22,500, while senior associate bonuses will be up to $150,000, according to name partner Beth Wilkinson. The bonuses were first reported by Above the Law.
The bonuses are on the same scale as the previous three years and come in at a rate 1.5 times greater than the market rate set by Milbank in November.
"We have extraordinary associates who deserve to share in our firm's success," Wilkinson said in an email. "We pride ourselves on paying above market and have done so since we started the firm in 2016."
Wilkinson, the 2015 American Lawyer Litigator of the Year, left Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison to start the firm in January 2016 alongside five other Big Law partners. Former Paul Weiss partner Alexandra Walsh and former Munger, Tolles & Olson partner Sean Eskovitz are also name partners.
Eskovitz added that the additional compensation reflected the greater responsibility the firm's associates handled in substantial matters.
Since its creation, the boutique has represented several high-profile clients, including former Virginia Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax, Bayer AG and Altria Group Inc.
Bonuses aren't the only arena in which Wilkinson Walsh will go above and beyond Big Law. The firm paid well above market rate to hire two U.S. Supreme Court clerks in 2017, doling out hiring bonuses of $350,000.
"If we think they've got the talent and the work ethic to succeed, we are more than willing to pay the market," Eskovitz told The American Lawyer at the time.
Wilkinson Walsh's status as a high-end boutique may explain why the bonuses are so great, as the firm competes with Big Law for the same talent, said Nathan Peart, managing partner of Major, Lindsey & Africa's associate practice group. Last year, high-end boutiques Selendy & Gay, Susman Godfrey and Kaplan Hecker & Fink also announced bonuses higher than the market scale.
"With litigation boutiques, there is much more flexibility around billing and the clients they work with compared to Big Law," Peart said, noting that such boutiques are usually formed because of the conflicts with transactional clients in Big Law and not being able to do certain work. "With bonuses, they can be more aggressive as a strategy to keep talent retention high."
The full scale for Wilkinson Walsh associate bonuses by year is as follows:
- Class of 2019 — $22,500 (prorated)
- Class of 2018 — $22,500
- Class of 2017 — $37,500
- Class of 2016 — $75,000
- Class of 2015 — $97,500
- Class of 2014 — $120,000
- Class of 2013 — $135,000
- Class of 2012 and earlier — $150,000
Read More:
Milbank Becomes First Mover With Early Associate Bonus Announcement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal 200 Firms Gaining Deal Share Amid Race to Build in India
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250