Honigman Gets Into Staff Attorney Game With New 'Professional Track'
The Am Law 200 firm says its program offers pricing flexibility for clients, while its new tier of lawyers have opportunities for training and advancement that other law firm staff attorneys don't.
December 10, 2019 at 03:52 PM
3 minute read
In what it's billing as a twist on other law firm staff attorney models, Honigman has launched a lower-cost staffing alternative to clients while promising a path to training and advancement for a new class of non-partner-track lawyers.
Those opportunities help to distinguish Honigman's professional attorney track from other law firms with similar programs, said Esther Bowers, director of practice management at the Detroit-based Am Law 200 firm.
"We draw various elements of things that exist and don't exist currently," Bowers said. "Our program is unique in that it has career advancement opportunities within the track itself; all sorts of training and integration into the firm so that our professional track attorneys are receiving the same level of education and opportunities as our partnership attorneys."
The three-tiered track is a bid on Honigman's part to provide cheaper legal services to clients who do not want to shell out money for the firm's higher-priced partners and associates.
With 275 lawyers generating $224 million last year, Honigman is ranked 134th in the Am Law 200. But while it may not be among the largest firms, it has a "reputation for being at the top end of the price scale," said Don Kunz, the chair of Honigman's corporate department. As a result, the firm is missing out on lower-priced, daily legal work the firm's clients need done, Kunz said.
The rates for the least-experienced lawyer among its staff attorneys are lower than the rates for Honigman's first- or second-year associates, which are around $200, Kunz said. Honigman currently employs 18 staff attorneys through the track, and more are expected to be hired, he added.
The professional track is "permitting us to do things for clients that, up until now, we weren't able to do on a basis that was profitable," Kunz said. "We're able to serve with clients with capable attorneys who are at the price point and to bring additional resources to bear."
Kunz said Honigman serves a lot of local clients in addition to a growing, national intellectual property and M&A practice. The kinds of work the staff attorneys would do are document reviews in litigation and corporate transactional areas, as well as occasionally helping out on complex cases, Kunz added.
Kunz envisioned the track being filled by lawyers who may not have graduated at the top of their law school class, but are still talented and highly capable. Often such attorneys struggle to find work, he added.
"What we can do is offer an environment, a place of employment, where they can come in, do rewarding work, do varied work, from time to time get involved in complex work," Kunz said.
|Read More
Shearman Vet, Silicon Valley CEO Aim to Upend Legal Talent Market With New Startup
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250