Marketers Seize a Heightened Strategic Role, Survey Shows
The survey found 20% of business development and marketing professionals have a seat on their firm's management committee.
December 16, 2019 at 05:59 AM
4 minute read
Marketing and business development professionals are shifting into more strategic roles at large law firms, spurring data-driven decisions and more intrafirm collaboration, according to a new survey from LexisNexis.
The report from the legal information giant's InterAction marketing unit found that more than half of marketing and business development leaders are responsible for firm growth planning and tracking, while 20% of those professionals have a seat on their firm's management committee.
This is a step in the right direction, said Meghan Frank, the global director of marketing for LexisNexis Legal & Professional Software Solutions.
"Marketing and business development professionals are really the voice of the client," Frank explained. "They are the ones that understand what is happening in the market. They see what companies are doing, and they are the ones that are viewing the data to develop and pursue a strategy that will work and allow firms to grow and meet objectives."
The survey found that 56% of these leaders have a stake in growth planning. More than 60% of respondents to the survey agreed that they are now recognized as law firms' expert advisers who drive strategic outcomes. Their access to and use of data to guide decision-making is another sign of their enhanced role.
That's driven by a growing recognition that the historic way law firms have done business, based on selling via relationships, is no longer sufficient.
"Legal is just a slow-moving industry in general: slow to adopt technology and slow to change. That's a testament to how they've been able to run their businesses and the success that's been accorded to them in doing the same thing," Frank said. "Now corporations are taking a second look, narrowing down the number of firms that they work with and being more data-driven in their selection process. It's forcing legal to speed up and be more data-driven as well."
That's also spurring greater collaboration within law firms and between marketers and IT professionals in particular. Only 42% of respondents listed cross-firm collaboration as their top challenge in 2019, compared to 56% last year. And 70% of respondents pointed to successful collaboration between IT and marketing departments.
Frank explained that not only are marketers increasingly dependent on using technology to underpin data-driven business development strategies, but they also need to respond to clients' heightened interest in the degree that firms are adopting technology.
"Clients are asking about firm technology in RFPs," Frank said.
The results in the 2019 Law Firm Marketing and Business Development Survey came from 103 legal marketing and business development leaders, including 40 Am Law 100 chief marketing officers or chief business development officers.
Looking forward, these respondents recognize that they need to employ more focused strategies. According to the survey, 28% said that their top challenge in 2019 was pursuing too many marketing approaches, and 46% said that a consequence of this scattershot approach was a lack of consistent follow-up.
Frank said that, by increasing collaboration, firms had made progress on last year's top challenge.
"Their priority has to be a data-driven targeted strategy, now that the awareness is there and they've chipped away at other challenges," she said.
|Read More
Law Firm Marketers Catching Up With 'New Normal,' Survey Shows
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Funnel Millions to Congressional Races, Though Skew Toward Dems
4 minute readPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readDLA Piper Exhibited 'Far From Exemplary Conduct' in Patent Infringement Case, Judge Finds
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250