A Winning Design: Morgan Lewis, IP Litigation Department of the Year Winner
Morgan Lewis' national IP team covers all the bases for clients.
December 29, 2019 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
Whether Morgan, Lewis & Bockius' intellectual property department is grinding out five years of posttrial motions and appeals, sprinting to a jury verdict in 13 months or playing multidimensional chess across five different forums, the firm's depth and resourcefulness have helped it bring home outstanding results.
The wins include a $268 million judgment in a dispute over ear implant technology; a fight over garage door openers waged in district court, the USPTO, the International Trade Commission, the Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and a $2.9 million jury award for the maker of Gavrieli Tieks ballet flats.
"Even a small IP case can have tremendous complications, and Morgan Lewis has been having a terrific run of success," Silicon Valley partner Michael Lyons says. "There's really no way to do that without a big team where you can draw on expertise across forums and on appeals."
Lyons helped try Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research v. Cochlear, in which a jury found that Cochlear Corp. infringed the foundation's patented noninvasive technology for testing and adjusting ear implants and awarded $131 million, in 2014. U.S. District Judge Fernando Olguin found three of the four asserted claims invalid, but Lyons and partner Thomas Peterson helped persuade the Federal Circuit to restore one of them. On remand in 2018, Olguin not only reinstated the damages, he doubled them for willful infringement. The foundation is now looking for affirmance from the Federal Circuit, with Lyons and Peterson again leading the way.
"Their briefing on this appeal was outstanding, and I am very confident that we will prevail on this round," says foundation CEO John Petrovich.
Chicago partner Jason White, meanwhile, helped defend Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd.'s garage-door openers from patent attacks by rival The Chamberlain Group Inc. The ITC excluded some products, but Morgan Lewis got the Court of International Trade to order the release of Techtronic's redesigned units. Morgan Lewis then persuaded the PTO to invalidate many of the claims at issue before the ITC.
Finalists: Fish & Richardson; Perkins Coie; Williams & Connolly.
Techtronic also won a Federal Circuit decision that knocked out on patent eligibility grounds a $22 million jury verdict for Chamberlain in district court. "I got to make the argument" to the Federal Circuit, White says, but partner William Peterson and associate Julie Goldemberg "wrote fantastic briefs."
The firm also got contributions from partner Dion Bregman at the PTAB, partner Eric Namrow at the ITC and senior associate Nicholas Restauri at the CIT, among others.
"Different teams, different groups just all came together," White says.
In the ballet flats case, Gavrieli Brands accused competitor Soto Massini of infringing its design patents and trade dress. The trial featured testimony from founder Kfir Gavrieli and photos of Oprah Winfrey and Meghan Markle sporting Tieks.
Lyons tried the case with Delaware partner John Gorman and associate Amy Dudash, plus colleagues from Silicon Valley. They argued that Kickstarter-funded Soto Massini was trying to peel off Tieks' passionate online following.
"There was this whole group on Kickstarter that was very interested in the case, and were frankly concerned by a lot of what they were learning," Lyons says. "Even as the case was being tried, this huge group of online commentary was playing out in real time."
Lyons says the firm's IP success comes by design.
"We've spent a lot of time talking about what a national team should look like," he says, "and we feel like we're really there now."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 2SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About,' Says Jennifer A. Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 4Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 5St. Ivo: Patron Saint of Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250