Taft, Lathrop GPM Officially Tie the Knot, Kicking Off 2020 Law Firm Mergers
Ten more law firm mergers are expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2020, according to Fairfax Associates.
January 03, 2020 at 01:46 PM
4 minute read
It's still barely 2020, but two major law firm unions are already official in the New Year—and more mergers are on the way that promise to help reshuffle the Am Law 200.
Wednesday saw the ink dry on the mergers creating Taft—the result of Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister merging with Minneapolis-based Briggs & Morgan—and Lathrop GPM, which is the offspring of Kansas City, Missouri-based Lathrop Gage and Minneapolis-based Gray Plant Mooty.
Taft now boasts 600-plus lawyers across 12 offices, while Lathrop GPM says it has nearly 400 lawyers across 14 offices. The merged firms' combined revenues have Taft poised to claim a berth in the Am Law 100, and Lathop likely to catapult from the lower to the middle Second Hundred.
Leaders at both Taft and Lathrop GPM said their respective mergers went as smoothly as they could have hoped.
"There were no hiccups or problems we didn't anticipate," said Steven Ryan, the partner in charge of Taft's Minneapolis office. Taft managing partner Robert Hicks expressed similar sentiments, saying while there was some "scrambling" at one point, "it couldn't have gone any better."
Lathrop GPM managing partner Cameron Garrison said they established an integration committee that compiled a to-do list of tasks with deadlines.
"As you can image, a combination of this size takes a lot of heavy lifting, and attorneys and staff throughout the organization have done a phenomenal job implementing the combination in a short amount of time," Garrison said.
Four partners and one associate from Briggs & Morgan defected before the merger was complete, Ryan said. Those five lawyers "decided the combined platform wasn't the best shift for their practices," and joined smaller firms, he added.
Garrison didn't say whether any lawyers left either firm as a result of the Lathrop GPM tie-up. Instead, he noted that "the beginning of the year is a time when some attorneys make the decision to leave for other opportunities. This happens for a variety of reasons."
Garrison said Lathrop GPM was "extremely diligent" in checking for client conflicts.
"We feel confident in our ability to serve our clients and we look forward to continuing our longtime relationships with them," Garrison said.
Taft identified 15 cases in which lawyers at the legacy firms were representing clients who were adversaries in other matters, Hicks said. Taft obtained conflict waivers in nearly every case and only had to break ties with one or two clients, he added.
Hicks said in the four months between the merger announcement and its completion, Briggs & Morgan and Taft Stettinius & Hollister referred clients to one another 25 times.
Taft is holding an all-lawyer retreat in Scottsdale, Arizona, later this month, Ryan said.
"We will come together… to begin really putting the details on what the combined firm is going to look like, how we're going to work together and collaborate," Ryan said. "We're tremendously excited about where things stand today."
Garrison said both Lathrop Gage and Gray Plant Mooty traditionally held their partner retreats in the fall, "and our executive board will, of course, be discussing future retreat plans for Lathrop GPM."
Apart from Taft and Lathrop GPM, 10 more law firm mergers are scheduled to close in the first quarter of 2020, according to consultancy Fairfax Associates. This includes Dentons' combinations with Indianapolis-based Bingham Greenebaum Doll and Pittsburgh-based Cohen & Grigsby, as a part of Dentons' "Golden Spike" strategy to ostensibly create the first national law firm in the U.S.
A Dentons spokeswoman said they "continue to anticipate launching sometime in January," but wouldn't give a specific date.
Starting Feb. 1, Faegre Baker Daniels in Minneapolis will merge with Drinker Biddle & Reath in Philadelphia to create Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath, an Am Law 50 firm with more than 1,300 lawyers and consultants with 22 offices in the U.S. and abroad.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 2Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 3Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
- 4Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
- 5Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250