Polsinelli Inks Deal With UnitedLex for Litigation Support Center
It's the New Law company's first publicly touted tie-up with a U.S. law firm since its ill-fated joint venture with LeClairRyan, ULX Partners.
January 06, 2020 at 05:06 PM
3 minute read
Kansas City-based Polsinelli is turning to New Law pioneer UnitedLex to build out a litigation solutions center focused on bolstering its eDiscovery capabilities.
The center, dubbed PolsinelliPLUS, will also give the firm and its clients access to Questio, UnitedLex's proprietary early case assessment tool. Both UnitedLex and the firm contend that by reducing the number of documents that attorneys must review by 90%, the arrangement will deliver clients significant savings on litigation costs.
"Polsinelli understands the physical and economic burden that clients experience with eDiscovery and legal data management, "Polsinelli chairman and CEO Chase Simmons said in a statement. "We are committed to continuous innovation that reduces cost and drives value for the companies we serve. This new solutions center will provide the highest level of customer service across the eDiscovery spectrum."
Polsinelli will also gain access to UnitedLex's technology platforms relating to eDiscovery, contracts and intellectual property. The firm will also be able to tap into 1,500 global attorney reviewers provided by UnitedLex. Additionally, its attorneys and staff can avail themselves of on-site training, lectures and continuing legal education programs from the company.
"Polsinelli is a textbook example of a law firm that has embraced digital transformation. PolsinelliPLUS has allowed UnitedLex and Polsinelli to achieve the best possible outcomes for clients," UnitedLex president David Deppe said in a statement. "We could not be more aligned on our collective mission and are grateful for the opportunity to have built this with the great people at Polsinelli."
UnitedLex CEO Dan Reed was unavailable to discuss the specifics of the arrangement Monday, but on the surface, it appears significantly less ambitious than the company's last publicly touted tie-up with a U.S. law firm.
In May 2018, the company launched "strategic business platform" ULX Partners with LeClairRyan, which announced it was disbanding just 16 months later. Under the arrangement, ULX hired more than 300 administrative and legal support professionals from the now bankrupt firm, taking over back-office and support staff services.
The plan behind that initiative was to enlist a growing number of law firms as partners. Like LeClairRyan, these firms would be granted minority equity stakes in the venture and rely upon it for their legal support functions—including HR, IT, knowledge management, pricing and procuring. Reed said at the time that his goal was to have 10,000 ULX employees in five years, but he has not gone on the record about the fate of the operation since LeClairRyan's fate became obvious.
Bankruptcy filings later revealed that LeClairRyan owned only 1% of the joint venture and owed UnitedLex $8 million.
|Read More
UnitedLex's Deal With LeClairRyan Was a Failure. Is It Also a Sign of Things to Come?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 2Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 3Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
- 4Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 5Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250