Why Polsinelli Bet on UnitedLex to Outpace In-House Litigation Support
"This was a firm that competes on the leading edge on technology more than we can," CEO Chase Simmons told his board at Polsinelli.
January 07, 2020 at 05:48 PM
3 minute read
Not long ago, Chase Simmons, chairman and CEO of Am Law 100 firm Polsinelli, recognized that the firm needed to bolster the way it uses technology to support its litigation work.
The firm had made internal investments in its litigation capabilities. And it had worked with outside vendors for support in areas including ediscovery and collections. One of these vendors was UnitedLex, whose CEO Dan Reed has pitched the company as a force intent on revolutionizing the legal industry.
Based on that previous collaboration as well as the company's reputation in the marketplace, Simmons said he launched a conversation about a closer relationship, which culminated in Monday's announcement of a new litigation solutions center named PolsinelliPLUS.
"What I took back to the board in my pitch was, 'This was a firm that competes on the leading edge on technology more than we can,'" Simmons said Tuesday.
According to Polsinelli shareholder Jay Heidrick, the firm analyzed its current use of technology in litigation and where it had been using outside support in the past to land at an arrangement that folds in capabilities addressing document review, contracts and cyber breach responses and other matters.
"We can go to our clients and say, 'Now we have a beginning-to-end offering for anything you might need in a litigation services atmosphere,'" he said.
As part of the arrangement, which is to last for at least five years, Polsinelli has rebadged a "handful" of its own litigation support employees to UnitedLex, while the company will be able to leverage "many times" that number of people towards the account.
Reed emphasized that the appropriate comparison for the deal was not UnitedLex's joint venture involving now-defunct firm LeClairRyan, ULX Partners, which focused on outsourcing back office staff for that firm and other potential partners, but rather a more recent arrangement with London-based Ashurst in Germany. In that tie-up, the company is supporting the firm's investigations practice with a suite of technological enhancements.
"Those are the avenues on which UnitedLex is supporting the best firms out there," Reed said. "We did go outside of usual sweet spot of the higher end of larger firms with ULX and LeClairRyan."
Reed added that UnitedLex would continue to be selective about the law firms it chooses to partner with and how it does so.
Simmons, meanwhile, acknowledged that Polsinelli is not alone when it comes to recognizing the opportunities that come from technology, and more specifically artificial intelligence.
"All firms are having discussions about what do to in house and what to purchase from outside," he said.
With regard to AI, he added: "The idea that the best of that is going to be created within a law firm is a bet I'm not willing to make."
|Read More
Polsinelli Inks Deal With UnitedLex for Litigation Support Center
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 2Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 3Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 4Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 5Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250