Shh! Don't Talk About the Rivalry in the Sisterhood
Women undermining women is still a part of the workplace, but it's not because we're hard-wired to catfight.
January 08, 2020 at 10:17 AM
3 minute read
This topic is old as the hills, but apparently it's still a touchy subject. When I ask some female lawyers about it, they snap at me like feisty turtles. Their message: Do not go there.
"I think it's a terrible, dangerous, retrograde topic," says a female partner at an Am Law 100 firm. "Really, please stop." She adds, "I don't think rivalries exist between women any more than between anyone else."
So add this to the list of verboten topics: How women still undermine women to get ahead in the workplace.
We'd like to believe that the bad old days of '80s-style mean girl dynamics are over, but is that true? (Remember how Melanie Griffith and Sigourney Weaver slugged it out to win the top job and Harrison Ford in "Working Girl"?)
The topic is ripe for an update, and lawyers Andrea Kramer and Alton Harris do just that. In the Harvard Business Review, the wife/husband team writes, on the one hand: "In conducting research for our book, "It's Not You, It's The Workplace," we could find no empirical evidence supporting the notion that women are more mean-spirited, antagonistic, or untrustworthy in dealing with other women than men are in dealing with other men."
You probably know that already—that women aren't born with a catfight gene. Still, the backstabbing dynamic is there, they say.
"The popular press and books about women take the position that it is women's nature or the way we're nurtured that make us antagonistic and hostile to other women," says Kramer, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery's Chicago office.
But she points out that heightened competition between women is real, too, adding that it's "gendered workplaces that are run by men and suffused with masculine values, culture and norms that force women into conflict with each other for the few leadership spots it has."
Sadly, consciously or subconsciously, women still look up to men as somehow superior because, well, men are the ones with power. It's the kind of ingrained gender bias, write the authors, that creates "pressure on women to adopt a decidedly masculine management style in order to identify with the male in-group and distance or differentiate themselves from their female peers."
In sum, we're not as evolved as we'd like to think. And that might be why some women would prefer that we stop pointing out how brutal the competition between women still can be. Of course, we'd like to believe that the Working Girl world is gone—gone like those ungainly padded-shoulder power suits and the huge hair.
"If we assume that conflict is caused by women's nature and that the only way to combat the problems is for women to 'stop being mean to each other,' then women should stop talking about it," says Kramer. "But the problem is really the workplace environment, so we need to talk about it so that women can understand the dynamics, men can advocate for gender equity, and organizations can remove discretion from career decisions."
Hey, you can't disagree with that. But the fact that we don't want to talk about it is precisely why we should.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
6 minute readHSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250