Wiley Rein Drops 'Rein,' Adds New Look and Moves to .Law Domain
The firm is just the latest to shorten its marketing moniker, but it says it's the first Am Law 200 firm to migrate from the "overcrowded and unregulated" .com domain.
January 15, 2020 at 05:00 AM
4 minute read
Washington, D.C.-based Wiley Rein is joining Big Law's single-name marketing blitz, rebranding as "Wiley" as it unveils a new website, logo, color scheme and .law domain.
"We decided as a partnership that the timing was right," managing partner Peter Shields said in an interview. "We have a focus on some new practices and thought it was time for our brand to reflect that."
The new Wiley made some bold aesthetic choices. Gone is the understated green and white palette that adorned wileyrein.com. In its place is a bright and bold red logo coupled with a deep purple script. It was designed to be noticed.
The colors, according to Shields, were recommended by Dharma Pachner, chief creative officer at consulting firm Contrast and Co. "He said the overall look and vibrancy reflected what he heard from the stakeholders. We never looked back," said Shields.
Those stakeholders included clients, partners, associates, staff and firm leaders, all of whom had input into the final product.
"We had various constituency groups participate in listening sessions to start," Shields said. "Our brand consultant then took that and came back to us. We were pleased with the concept and theme."
Shields said the process, from conception to completion, took about six months.
As in most law firm rebrands, a key goal behind the change was to actively reflect what the firm is now while still paying homage to the past that created it.
Shields said the firm wanted to highlight not just the practice areas it already promotes—such as its telecoms, media and technology group, election law and government ethics, government contracts, international trade and litigation—but also the firm's emerging practices around cybersecurity, drones, privacy, fintech and FTC work.
The firm is also touting its move to the .law Internet domain—which it says is a first for an Am Law 200 firm. Although it has been around for several years, the domain has not gained traction among larger firms.
The domain is reserved for law firms, and if an entity or practitioner wants to have it, they must provide proof they are in the legal services industry.
Wiley decided on .law as a differentiator from the "overcrowded and unregulated .com domain field," according to a press release.
Moving forward, the wileyrein.com site will redirect to wiley.law and all emails for the company will have the .law domain as well.
The firm had a form of soft launch over the holidays, sending the new "Wiley" brand image to clients in the form of holiday cards, chocolates and even Bluetooth speakers.
The reaction was strong and positive, and not just from clients, Shields said.
"I had a lateral come to me and say that this look and logo reflects the firm he wanted to join when he interviewed here," he said.
A parade of law firms have undertaken brand overhauls over the past year or so, including Katten Muchin Rosenman, Seyfarth Shaw, and Milbank, to name just a few.
Like many others that have shortened their names for marketing purposes, Wiley will still legally be known by the firm's full name, Wiley Rein, in what Shields said is a nod to the heritage of the firm.
"Since our founding, clients have turned to Wiley to solve their most pressing issues and anticipate the challenges that lie ahead," Shields said in a statement. "Our new brand represents who we are today—a firm with a focused mindset, interdisciplinary depth, a celebration of diversity, and a culture of collegiality."
Read More
Katten Jumps on Rebranding Bandwagon With New Image, Website
Seyfarth Takes On New Moniker, New Look
Who's Getting Left Out as Law Firms Race to Rebrand?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250