Baker McKenzie Is Tops Again in Global Legal Brand Rankings
The firm grew its lead in the Acritas index over runners-up DLA Piper and Clifford Chance.
January 21, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Baker McKenzie once again topped legal market research company Acritas' latest ranking of global legal brands, and the firm has managed to grow its lead.
In the Acritas 2020 Global Elite Brand Index, the firm widened its margin over its two closest competitors, DLA Piper and Clifford Chance, from the last iteration of the rankings, released in October 2018. The two runners-up exchanged positions since then, with DLA Piper jumping ahead of Clifford Chance, but the distance between them and Baker McKenzie has only widened.
"Market disruption is an accepted reality for business, as new competition and technologies drive the pace of change faster than ever before," Baker McKenzie global chair Milton Cheng said in a statement. "Our clients want lawyers who are prepared to lead, differentiate and adapt in a constantly changing world. We are unquestionably the leading cross-border law firm that large, global clients trust for complex transactional and other matters involving multiple jurisdictions."
While Acritas has been ranking law firms in terms of brand strength for over a decade, this is the company's first release since being acquired by Thomson Reuters in the fall.
Lisa Hart Shepherd, vice president of research and advisory services at Thomson Reuters, attributed Baker McKenzie's dominance to its relatively early decision to prioritize a global approach.
"Everybody at the firm has bought in," she said. "Whether you're a new partner, a trainee, a lateral, you wouldn't be there unless you're interested in the international scale of the firm."
Hart Shepherd compared that to other firms on the list that have aimed to reorient towards a global focus more recently: "They have a mix of talent, including some who might have preferred it when it was just a domestic firm."
While many firms moved up or down within the top 20 this year, only four firms closed the gap on Baker McKenzie in Acritas' point system: White & Case, CMS, Morgan Lewis and Kirkland & Ellis.
Over the last decade, Dentons has seen the biggest rise of any firm on the list, closing the gap on Baker McKenzie by 16 points. This growth coincides with the firm's aggressive expansion, largely via combinations, to become the largest firm in the world, with a presence in 74 countries.
"That increased scale is helping them to win mindshare in the market," Hart Shepherd said. "It's taking a while to catch up to what the brand should be for their scale, but Dentons is still on the journey."
Hart Shepherd noted that while the top 10 in the index is distinguished by a set of players that have been steady over the years thanks to a footprint that extends across all key continents, the firms in the second 10—apart from Dentons—still are anchored more in the U.S., or in Asia—King Wood & Mallesons—and Europe—CMS and Herbert Smith Freehills.
As it's done since 2010, Acritas interviewed 1,600 respondents with responsibility for buying legal services at billion-dollar organizations across more than 50 countries and asked them to name the most well-known law firms, those that they perceived favorably, and those they would be most likely to use for cross-border deals and disputes.
By keeping questions consistent over time, Acritas has also found that on the whole, clients needs have grown more global: they are reporting a greater likelihood to require legal work outside of their home countries, are active in an increasing number of countries, and are boosting the percentage of their budget dedicated to overseas legal spending.
Next up for Acritas, in February, is the company's inaugural Prestige Law Firm Brand Index, focusing on both the domestic and international firms most frequently considered for top-level work.
|Read More
EY, Big Four Top Brand Rankings for Alternative Legal Services
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readPolsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250