Big Law Again Tops Big Business for LGBTQ Equality, Report Says
More law firms than ever before earned perfect scores in the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality Index.
January 21, 2020 at 06:55 PM
3 minute read
Big Law continues to improve how it supports lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer employees, while outpacing corporate America once again.
More law firms than ever before earned perfect scores in the Human Rights Campaign Foundation's latest Corporate Equality Index—130 out of 164 participants in 2020 according to a table in the report. In the 2019 report, 114 of 164 participants earned the highest possible rating.
The latest result compares favorably to the Fortune 500, where just 59.6% of businesses submitting information earned perfect scores. The HRC invited the 200 highest grossing law firms in the U.S. to participate in its evaluation, and 79.3% of those firms hit a score of 100.
"Year after year, the highly competitive legal field continues to be the sector with the largest number of top-rated employers in the Corporate Equality Index," Beck Bailey, director of the HRC Foundation's Workplace Equality Program, said in a statement. "This consistent excellence shows that law firm leaders know that LGBTQ inclusion is absolutely essential in attracting and retaining top attorneys and staff."
With the exception of last year's results, the number of law firms receiving perfect scores has been steadily rising. In 2017, the organization assigned 127 perfect scores, a step up from 2017, which saw 112 perfect scores. That in turn was a rise from 95 in 2016 and 87 in 2015.
Six law firms that did not participate in 2019 were part of this year's results.
The survey, which is voluntary, evaluates the nation's largest companies and top-grossing law firms, the Am Law 100 and 200, in four areas: nondiscrimination policies based on sexual orientation, gender identity and expression; equitable benefits for LGBTQ workers and their families; supporting an inclusive culture and corporate social responsibility including public commitment to LGBTQ equality; and responsible citizenship.
Meanwhile, the question of whether a federal law against workplace discrimination protects gay, lesbian and transgender employees remains in the hands of the U.S. Supreme Court, which held oral arguments on the applicability of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in October.
The HRC praised the more than 260 top businesses—191 of which earned top scores on the CEI—for their public support of the Equality Act, a proposed federal law that would guarantee explicit, permanent protections for LGBTQ people under the nation's existing civil rights laws.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250