Big Law Is Taking the Coronavirus Outbreak Seriously
The virus has infected 2,827 people and killed 81, according to China's National Health Commission. It's becoming a concern for the legal community that lives and works in China.
January 27, 2020 at 05:56 PM
4 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Squire Patton Boggs, influential U.S. law firms with offices in Shanghai, are paying for employees to take taxis instead of public transit.
Baker McKenzie is asking employees in its Shanghai, Beijing and Hong Kong offices to work from home.
London-founded CMS, which already has its employees in Shanghai and Beijing working from home for the extended New Year holiday, said it will continue that policy until it has a better assessment of the situation.
While not necessarily sounding the alarm, Big Law is taking a strong interest in how China handles a viral outbreak that is poised to expand. The Wuhan coronavirus, which has infected 2,827 people and killed 81, according to China's National Health Commission, is spreading, and it is becoming a concern for the legal community that lives and works in China.
The country quarantined the city of Wuhan, where the virus is believed to have originated, as well as surrounding areas, in an effort to stop it from spreading. It hasn't worked.
Wuhan, with a population of 11 million people, is bigger than the largest city in the United States. There are 56 million people affected by China's quarantine. That would be like taking the populations of Florida, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky and West Virginia and locking them down.
As Law.com International has reported, the only major global law firm with a presence in Wuhan, which is in the Hubei province in central China, is Dentons. The firm has a partnership with Dacheng in the region. The firm's regional arm was not available to comment.
Herbert Smith Freehills, the London- and Sydney-headquartered global firm with offices in Shanghai and Beijing, said the Chinese New Year holiday, which now extends until Feb. 2 in Beijing and Feb. 10 in Shanghai, is allowing the firm to keep employees at home while monitoring the situation.
Baker McKenzie, which has asked its employees to work from home for the time being, also is suspending nonessential travel.
"Our current advice to our colleagues in impacted jurisdictions, based on the latest guidance from the relevant health authorities, is to stay at home if they have recently traveled to those areas in China most impacted by the virus, if they have been in close contact with someone suspected or confirmed to have the virus, or if they are displaying respiratory symptoms themselves," the firm said. "We are also postponing nonessential business travel to and from Mainland China."
More than 30 firms were contacted for this piece. Several declined to comment on procedural changes for China or Hong Kong-based staff. Others said they did not have enough information to warrant a statement at this time. Either way, it wasn't a popular topic to discuss on the record.
While outbreaks of disease in densely populated areas are always a cause for concern, the Wuhan coronavirus could be particularly troublesome. The Chinese government is taking extraordinary measures to contain the virus and treat those infected. In addition to the quarantine, the government is constructing two new hospitals in Wuhan specifically to deal with the outbreak, and it is sending 1,200 medical and 135 People's Liberation Army personnel to help quell the spread.
Although it is a small sample size, the strength of the virus could be of concern as it spreads. The typical flu season sees a mortality rate of about 0.1% of those infected. They are mostly the elderly, very young and those with a compromised immune system. The Wuhan virus, having killed 81 out of 2,827 infected in China, carries a mortality rate of 2.8%, higher than the estimated 2.5% mortality rate of the 1918 Spanish flu outbreak. That pandemic killed over 50 million people.
Read More:
The China 45 Are Growing Rapidly—and Not Just the Elites
China Mirrors International Counterparts With New App Privacy Requirements
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250