Brazilian Bar Association Warns Global Firms Not to Overstep by Advising on Local Law
The country's bar association is specifically investigating whether Cleary Gottlieb and other firms are offering prohibited advice on Brazilian matters.
January 27, 2020 at 05:53 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com International
The Brazilian bar association says it will take a closer look at how foreign law firms are conducting themselves in the country following multiple complaints that global firms are providing services that only local firms may provide.
Ary Raghiant Neto, deputy secretary-general of the Order of Brazilian Attorneys, said in a statement last week that the order "will not tolerate" foreign firms overstepping their bounds by providing advice on Brazilian law.
The order allows non-Brazilian firms to advise on legal matters in their home countries but expressly forbids foreign law firms from consulting on Brazilian law even if they do so in conjunction with Brazilian members of the bar association.
"We do not want to restrict the Brazilian market, far from it," said Raghiant Neto, while cautioning that foreign firms must comply with the bar's provision dictating the parameters of their service.
Brazil is an integral piece of many Latin American law practices. Its $1.8 trillion economy is the largest in the region and this year, a series of planned asset sales and other market liberalizations are expected to generate lots of corporate work for global firms.
The Brazilian bar association authorizes foreign firms on a discretionary basis to conduct business in the country. But some services, such as big ticket matters like internal investigations and due diligence, could fall into a gray area.
Raghiant Neto also sent a letter dated January 21 to the president of Brazilian development bank BNDES asking for more detail on the hiring of New York-based Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, together with Brazilian firm Levy & Salomão Advogados, to conduct an internal audit for BNDES.
He asked for an explanation of the role played by Cleary Gottlieb lawyers, emphasizing that foreigners and foreign economic groups are "prohibited" from practicing law in Brazil. The contract was reportedly worth the equivalent of more than $11 million.
In a statement to Law.com International, Cleary Gottlieb said that it "conducts all of its activities in Brazil in accordance with applicable laws."
Cleary Gottlieb is a top-billing international firm with a dozen lawyers in Brazil. It has been counsel on over $100 billion in capital markets offerings by Brazilian issuers since 2000 and on nearly $60 billion in Brazil-related mergers and acquisitions during the same period.
The firm opened its São Paulo office in 2011 after more than 40 years of serving clients located in Brazil or doing business there.
The Order of Brazilian Attorneys grants global firms like Cleary Gottlieb licenses to operate as foreign legal consultants in Brazil with the understanding that their lawyers will not advise on matters of Brazilian law — even if they have bar admissions in Brazil.
The BNDES investigation, which involved probing allegations of bribery related to transactions with meatpacker JBS and pulp maker Eldorado, is one of several investigations that Cleary Gottlieb has worked on in Brazil.
The firm assisted a special committee of the board of M. Dias Branco, a Brazilian foodstuff company, in connection with an independent investigation of allegations of bribery. It also helped miners BHP Billiton, Vale, and Samarco with an investigation of the collapse of the Fundão tailings dam in the Minas Gerais region of Brazil.
Compared with local firms, large global law firms may have more expertise, manpower and technology tools they can apply to arduous revisions of voluminous emails and other documents that could point to corruption within companies.
Sometimes, investigations relate directly to dispelling concerns of U.S. authorities. For instance, Cleary Gottlieb aided a special committee of the board of directors of Brazilian airline GOL with investigations into potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act being conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
"When you say that foreign law firms can only practice foreign law, sometimes that's not easy to distinguish," said Allen Moreland, a partner at New York-based Robinson Brog who is also registered as a foreign legal advisor with the Brazilian bar association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Trending Stories
- 1St. Jude Labs Sued for $14.3M for Allegedly Falling Short of Purchase Expectations
- 2'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
- 3States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 4$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
- 5'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250