This Reed Smith Partner Wants to Make Sure You Don't Get Sued for Your Super Bowl Ad
Jason Gordon, a partner in the firm's entertainment and media group, says the Super Bowl advertising frenzy is rife with legal pitfalls that keep his practice busy each year.
January 31, 2020 at 02:22 PM
5 minute read
AB InBev ran a Super Bowl ad last year that said Miller Lite used corn syrup in its beer. Miller Lite sued, and the suit is still ongoing.
A few years ago E-Trade ran an ad that referenced the name "Lindsay" for one of the ad's characters, a baby with a "milk problem." The company was sued by actress Lindsay Lohan, who was dealing with alcohol issues at the time. The case settled.
Super Bowl advertising has become … well, the Super Bowl of TV advertising, with companies vying to launch new products, increase brand awareness and hopefully dominate post-game conversation with their message.
But in their zeal to make a splash, the ads can skirt the line between copyright infringement and parody, or test other legal boundaries. And even the most straightforward ads require negotiation with networks and talent on the back end. That's where Reed Smith partner Jason Gordon comes in.
Trust the Process
"At the end of the day, the exciting part about advertising and marketing law is that there's a lot of gray area," Gordon said. "You won't go to prison [for violations], but there is the chance of big, federal litigation."
Gordon, based out of Reed Smith's Chicago office and a partner in the firm's entertainment and media group, said that the Super Bowl is one of the busier times of year for his practice, and with good reason: Super Bowl ads often account for a company's most visible and costly single advertising spend during the year, and everything needs to go as planned.
And that plan begins much earlier than some might think.
"The work starts in late summer," Gordon said. "The discussions start with concepts from the ad agencies, which approach companies who have an interest in buying space at the Super Bowl. Some will pitch really splashy ads with celebrities or movie references, others try to stay on an existing theme, while others take a philanthropic approach."
Gordon said that companies tend to accept more conceptual risk in Super Bowl ads, as they have a chance to really connect with an audience and create a narrative that has a long tail.
"Think of the Budweiser Frogs or the 'Wassup?' campaigns," Gordon said.
Go Deep for Big Money
The price point for a Super Bowl ad this year is between $2 million for an ad before or after the game and around $5 million to $5.6 million for an in-game ad, which can attract close to 100 million viewers, according to Statistica.
With so much money and potential exposure on the line, Gordon says it is key to have legal counsel involved from the outset to help guide the process.
"It can be a situation where a script seems fine," Gordon said. "But once it is put in front of a screen with music and background, it could cause trouble."
On top of advising the client on litigation risk, Gordon said his team is involved in negotiating with the networks that air the content as well as contract negotiations with celebrities who often dominate Super Bowl ad screen time.
"There are two really big work streaks," Gordon said. "The negotiation of the deal is first. So many celebrities are in Super Bowl ads, you have to deal with their agency, manager and lawyers to make sure they are present and ready for the shoot as well as social media spots, banner ads and B-roll."
That work can be thorny.
"From a publicity perspective, the group that is the most litigious is Hollywood, especially if they are doing look-alikes or sound-alikes," Gordon said.
The next challenge, he said, is trying to look through a script and storyboard and trying to imagine what the finished product will look like before it is shot.
"That is where I will be able to point out what to watch for," he said.
After the client has established the project, negotiated with celebrities and produced a final product, there's still the network to deal with.
"The final review is network clearance," Gordon said. "It's their air, and the networks have specific guidelines." He said he tries to keep the networks in the loop throughout the ad creation process to avoid any last minute hiccups.
"There are certain things I've found networks don't like, such as emergency sounds [sirens, tornado alarms] and swearing covered by a 'bleep' among them," he said.
Even if the company, celebrity actor, ad agency, attorneys and the network all come to a consensus that the ad is on the level, other elements can come into play.
Gordon said the NFL once had an ad pulled after reviewing what had already been accepted by the airing network, much to the chagrin of the company that spent a lot of time, money and energy on the project.
He said he's been working hard to make sure that doesn't happen. Now that the ads have been sold (Fox said it sold out the Super Bowl air back in December 2019 for a February broadcast), he jokingly wondered if anyone would see his work.
"Will anyone read my disclaimers at the bottom of the ad?" he joked.
Read More
Patriots Owner Robert Kraft Offered Plea Deal in Prostitution Case
Without Ed Hochuli, Who Is the Most Recognizable NFL Lawyer-Referee?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Still More to Be Had': New Chicago Law Firm Leaders Have High Growth Aspirations
6 minute readKirkland and Quinn Emanuel Spar Over Disclosure of Litigation Funder Contracts in Patent Suit Against Google
DLA Piper Leads Big Law in Social Media as More Firms Shun Facebook: Report
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250