Former Ogletree Deakins Lawyer Drops $300M Gender Bias Suit
Both sides moved to drop the $300 million gender discrimination lawsuit Dawn Knepper had filed against her former firm. The lawsuit had been in arbitration for months.
February 03, 2020 at 12:44 PM
3 minute read
A $300 million gender discrimination lawsuit brought by a former nonequity shareholder at Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart has reached its end in California federal court.
With a three-page stipulation, Ogletree and its former lawyer Dawn Knepper agreed to dismiss claims that the labor and employment specialty law firm "systematically overlooks, devalues, or undermines female attorneys as business generators, which adversely impacts their pay and promotion."
The dismissal of the lawsuit came about 11 months after U.S. District Judge James Selna of the Central District of California remanded the case to arbitration. The stipulation stated that nearly all of the claims from Knepper's second amended complaint would be dismissed with prejudice, and both sides will pay their own attorney fees and costs.
"Knepper was on notice that if she did not opt-out, she would be bound to arbitrate. Since she continued working at Ogletree after March 1, 2016 without opting out, she was bound by the terms of the arbitration agreement," Selna wrote in a March 26, 2019, order.
At this point, no one is saying why the case is being dismissed, including whether a settlement had been reached. Knepper's attorneys at Sanford Heisler Sharp declined to comment; Ogletree's attorneys at Paul Hastings did not respond to requests for comment as of press time.
Knepper, now a shareholder at Buchalter, told The American Lawyer in October 2018 that she was compelled to sue her former firm because she believed she had been mistreated.
"I felt I had exhausted every outlet within the firm to try and raise my concerns. I had experienced discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and a hostile work environment, which was really difficult," Knepper said.
At one point during the proceedings, Knepper was joined by three former nonequity Ogletree shareholders—Jocelyn Campanaro, Angelica Ochoa and Alicia Voltmer, all of whom said they experienced the same kind of gender discrimination Knepper experienced. They withdrew from the case in July, according to court records.
Sanford Heisler has mounted a litigation campaign against law firms over claims of gender bias and discrimination, going up against Jones Day and Morrison & Foerster in lawsuits estimated to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
|Read More
Judge Rules Plaintiff in Ogletree Gender Discrimination Suit Bound by Arbitration Agreement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal 200 Firms Gaining Deal Share Amid Race to Build in India
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250