Litigation Funding Leader Burford Warns of Profit Dip
The company sought to minimize the impact of the dip, pointing to litigation successes in January 2020 and a record high in funding commitments. Investors responded positively to the news.
February 03, 2020 at 01:24 PM
4 minute read
Burford Capital announced Monday that its profits from the last year were likely to be lower than those from 2018, but the litigation finance giant highlighted a record $1.6 billion in commitments to new investments.
In an update on its 2019 trading performance, the company sought to minimize the impact of an expected $20-30 million dip in net realized gains and an anticipated $50-70 million decline in unrealized gains, pointing to a series of litigation wins in January 2020.
The London-listed financier had a tumultuous 2019, when an attack from short-selling investment research firm Muddy Waters caused the company's stock prices to plunge and prompted a shakeup in its leadership structure.
"Burford had an exceptional year of growth in 2019, including a 24% increase in overall commitments, positioning the business favourably for the years ahead, while our returns remained robust and even inched higher than before," Burford CEO Christopher Bogart said in a statement. "The new year is off to a brisk start. This is evident in our January numbers where, if ultimately affirmed and paid, would generate more than $150 million in profits for Burford and more than $100 million in balance sheet profits in a single month."
The company's stock, which trades on London's AIM exchange for smaller businesses, ticked upwards on the news, rising over 3% over the course of trading Monday.
In addition to its $1.6 billion in new commitments, Burford said that it deployed $1.1 billion to investments over the course of 2019, matching its tally for the previous year. In March 2019, Burford announced a total of $2.6 billion in commitments over the previous two years. That figure was accompanied by a 23% increase in operating profit over 2018.
This year, the company chose to emphasize a jump in its cash proceeds, which rose 23%, and the fact that it posted a record low $6 million in losses across its litigation portfolio, compared to $21 million the previous year.
"We focus on cash, and the best value outcome for shareholders from our investments, rather than managing realisations to an accounting year-end," the company said in its announcement. "We can't control when courts rule or matters resolve—and in many instances we make more money from delay because of the pricing structure of our legal finance assets."
Burford and its peers in the commercial litigation finance arena have recently been pushing a narrative that corporations are increasingly receptive to using outside capital to advance lawsuits, as demonstrated in a report released by the company in June. The company pointed iMonday to a $75 million monetization for a Fortune 100 company as an example.
Burford's value plunged by roughly half after the short-selling attack by Muddy Waters in August, but the company's stock has traded relatively steadily since then. It reassigned its finance chief, Bogart's spouse, to a new role that month, and announced a number of new management roles in January.
The attack also prompted a securities class action lawsuit against Burford in New York, which was dismissed in December. The company is currently investigating claims of market manipulation and suspicious trading against Muddy Waters and has asked a London judge to weigh in.
Read More
Litigation Finance Sector Saw Growth—and Growing Pains—in 2019
Burford Touts Management Moves, Potential NY Listing and End to Investor Class Action
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Trending Stories
- 1Pro Hac Vice in Georgia: Rule Change for Nonresident Attorneys
- 2The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
- 3AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
- 4A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
- 5‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250