Orrick's Partner Profits Break $2 Million, Firm Posts Double-Digit Revenue Growth
Orrick's profits per equity partner grew by 14% last year as its large institutional clients entrusted the firm with more work.
February 10, 2020 at 05:41 PM
4 minute read
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe posted double-digit growth in revenue and partner profits last year as the firm surpassed the $2 million mark in profits per equity partner for the first time.
According to preliminary numbers submitted by Orrick, the firm's revenues grew by nearly 11% in the fiscal year 2019, from $1.05 billion to $1.16 billion. Profits per equity partner (PEP) jumped 14%, from $1.99 million to $2.27 million; and revenue per lawyer grew 8%, from $1.09 million to $1.17 million.
Orrick global chairman and CEO Mitch Zuklie attributed the stellar financial year to the firm's large institutional clients, including Microsoft, Oracle, Johnson & Johnson and Ocwen, which entrusted the firm with more matters.
"I'm most excited by the fact that our most important clients are trusting us with more work across more areas than ever before," Zuklie said.
Zuklie said the firm makes a point of being responsive to clients' needs. This may mean aggressively courting a lawyer at a rival firm who the client admires or bringing in attorneys with the expertise they ask for—especially in cybersecurity, which is an area of growing importance but where there aren't yet deep, long-standing relationships.
"It's like that old political saying: 'It's the economy, stupid.' Except for us, the saying goes, 'It's the clients, stupid,'" Zuklie said.
Cybersecurity growth was the impetus behind Orrick's new Boston office, which was founded by former Ropes & Gray's cybersecurity co-heads Doug Meal and Heather Egan Sussman. The lateral hiring has continued into 2020 with the addition of former PwC cybersecurity attorneys Keily Blair and James Lloyd in London.
Zuklie says Orrick has not strayed from the strategy it launched as it came out of the great recession—one that calls for the firm to excel in three key areas: technology and innovation, energy and infrastructure, and finance.
He said the firm's technology and finance teams helped clients raise a collective $19 billion in venture capital financing in 2019, up 24% year over year, and guided several companies in their initial public offerings, including Beyond Meat's $240.6 million offering last year.
Zuklie added that the firm was very active in litigation, taking 21 cases to trial and working on 30 appeals last year.
Orrick is representing Oracle in its $8 billion copyright case against Google, which is set to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Orrick attorneys, in defense of Microsoft, also successfully fended off a class certification in a high-profile gender pay suit in December.
Despite the additions in Boston and hires in Silicon Valley, New York, Los Angeles and Seattle, partner head count remained flat for the second year running. Its year-end head count totaled 117, down one equity partner from last year. The firm saw several attorneys defect to rival firms, including Winston & Strawn, Sidley Austin and Greenberg Traurig. Orrick added 26 non-partner attorneys last year, increasing its total head count to 990.
In 2020, Orrick said it will continue to develop legal technology products through its in-house technology arm, Orrick Labs. This year, the firm is planning to launch a new product, Joinder, which is currently in beta testing, as the firm continues to look for ways to spin off and monetize legal technology products. Zuklie also alluded to an "on-demand staffing solution" that the firm is developing along with Major, Lindsey & Africa.
"You'll see us partner more with businesses that aren't in the legal space, per se, and spinning products off as individual companies as part of our business strategy," he said.
Client engagement with the firm's data analytics arm, Orrick Analytics, grew in 2019 as well. The team of attorneys and statisticians, who use artificial intelligence and other tools to work on document-heavy matters more efficiently, saw their project caseload grow by 24% and their client roster by 11% to 506 total clients.
The 2019 financial figures reported in this story are preliminary. ALM will report finalized data for the Am Law 200 in The American Lawyer's May and June issues.
|
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250