Holland & Knight's Revenues Break a Billion Dollars
The firm's leader credited a strategy that prioritized U.S. dominance over international reach and said the firm will double down on the U.S. focus in the coming years.
February 13, 2020 at 02:34 PM
5 minute read
Holland & Knight generated more than a billion dollars in revenue in 2019—a financial record for the firm and almost double its revenues coming out of the 2008 recession.
Gross revenue at the Florida-founded firm grew by 12.2% last year, from $915 million to $1.03 billion. Even with more equity partners on board, average profits per equity partner saw a 10% increase, from $1.42 million to $1.57 million. And revenue per lawyer grew 5.6%, from $802,000 to $847,000.
Net income for the rose 24%, from $262.6 million to $325.4 million.
The breakthrough is a watershed moment for managing partner Steve Sonberg, who took the reins of a much smaller firm in the midst of the recession in 2008. In 2009, the firm posted revenues of $546 million and employed 934 lawyers, according to ALM data.
About a decade later, the firm now boasts 1,212 lawyers among offices in 28 cities, growing revenues by $481 million. Sonberg attributes this growth to the strategy it implemented in 2011, which prioritized U.S. dominance over international reach. Around 94% of the firm's attorneys work in the U.S.
"That focus was to maintain a concentrated effort on the U.S. market as well as Latin America and not getting distracted by looking east and west," Sonberg said. "That strategy has worked very well for us."
The firm has three international offices. In 2019, its Mexico City and Bogata, Colombia, offices housed 24 and 34 attorneys, respectively. The firm's London office is staffed with an aviation and maritime transportation finance team led by Robert Ricketts and employs just 10 attorneys.
Sonberg said they will double down on their U.S. focus in the coming years, even as it pushes further into the rarified air of the Am Law 50 where many have made the pivot toward international locations.
"There's a very elite group of firms I think that dominate the No. 1 to No. 25 spots, and I think they have a different practice than we have," Sonberg said. "We have a very diverse practice, more so than a lot of them. I think we're trying to make our practice better, not emulate or copy somebody else's practice."
Over the decade, the firm's once-small transactional practice is now larger than its litigation department, with 250 attorneys deployed in the financial services space serving nearly every major financial institution including Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Capital One and PNC Bank.
Another 225 attorneys work in the corporate mergers and acquisitions space, with a third of those lawyers servicing private equity clients, as the firm carves out a high-volume mid-market M&A practice. Last year, Bloomberg ranked the firm as No. 20 in mid-market transactions up to $500 million and No. 17 for transactions up to $250 million by volume of deals.
Roughly 20% of the firm's ranks are real estate attorneys, making its real estate department one of the largest among full-service law firms, Sonberg said. Last year, the firm advised Verizon on the $1 billion sale of its Sunnyvale, California, campus to Google. In Florida, the firm helped soccer star David Beckham secure a $50 million loan to finance a stadium for his Major League Soccer team Inter Miami CF. And in Mexico City, Holland & Knight helped advise Mexican real estate trust Fibra Uno on the $841 million purchase of an industrial property.
Holland & Knight's equity partnership grew by 13%, from 184 to 208. The firm added 71 lawyers at a growth rate of 6.2% in 2019.
Perhaps the firm's largest single group hire came when David Spector, who briefly ran his former firm Akerman, jumped over to Holland & Knight, bringing along his fraud and recovery practice and 12 attorneys.
The firm further bolstered its M&A ranks with hirings of Craig Circosta, who had led Ballard Spahr's M&A practice; DLA Piper private equity partner Omari Sealy; and McDermott Will & Emery partner Matthew Bielen.
In notable real estate hires, Holland & Knight lured away a six-attorney team led by partner Noah Shapiro from Haynes and Boone in New York, as well Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel real estate attorney Sara Bernard in Orlando, Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
What Practices Are Driving Law Firms’ ‘Remarkable’ Performance in 2024?
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
- 2People in the News—Nov. 19, 2024—Pond Lehocky, Duane Morris
- 3Court System's Franklin H. Williams Judicial Commission Presents Annual Diversity Awards
- 4Commentary: James Madison, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 5The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250