Fox Rothschild, Ex-Atty Say Harassment and Assault Claims Don't Hold Up in NY
Plaintiff Stephanie Jones worked for the firm in Morristown, New Jersey. But her accusations against former Fox Rothschild lawyer Ian Siminoff landed in Manhattan federal court.
February 18, 2020 at 02:26 PM
3 minute read
A former Fox Rothschild lawyer who was accused by a onetime paralegal of sexual harassment and attempted rape wants the woman's New York federal lawsuit thrown out, contending that her claims under New York state law are invalid and her claims under New Jersey law came too late.
Fox Rothschild made similar arguments in the firm's own motion to dismiss the case against it and Ian Siminoff, who worked in the firm's Morristown, New Jersey, office until hours after Stephanie Jones filed her lawsuit in December. Siminoff also asserted that the two had a consensual relationship until Jones was fired by the firm in 2017.
"Over a nearly four-year period, Mr. Siminoff and plaintiff Stephanie Jones had a consensual relationship during which they exchanged text messages, engaged in consensual physical contact, and routinely met for meals and drinks, including at the insistence of plaintiff," Paduano & Weintraub attorneys Meredith Cavallaro and Courtney Fain said in the filing.
"Now, more than two years after the termination of her employment, and primarily in reliance on an obviously cherry-picked sample of the thousands of text messages she exchanged with Mr. Siminoff, plaintiff tries to recast her consensual relationship with Mr. Siminoff and brings baseless claims of sexual harassment," they continued.
Jones, 58, alleged "pervasive unwanted sexual comments, advances, requests and other similar conduct" at the firm, including an attempted rape in her December lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
But Siminoff said the complaint against him should be dismissed in its entirety because all of Jones' claims under both New Jersey and New York state law do not hold up. Fox Rothschild, who is represented by attorneys from Fisher & Phillips, also said that most of the claims against the firm were equally flawed. And both parties asserted that the case does not belong in the Southern District of New York.
Siminoff and the firm both emphasized that claims under New York state and city human rights laws do not apply because Jones worked exclusively in New Jersey. They also said that claims under a New Jersey statute, the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, are time-barred, as are tort claims under New York and New Jersey state law for assault and battery, negligent infliction of emotional distress , and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Both parties also pushed for a blanket dismissal on the grounds that there was no indication in the complaint that Jones experienced any discrimination or harm in New York, while Fox Rothschild suggested that a transfer to New Jersey would be an appropriate remedy.
Jones' attorney, New York lawyer Tyrone Blackburn, responded Tuesday by noting the filings made it clear Fox Rothschild's attorneys were working "hand in hand" with Siminoff's counsel, despite the fact the firm announced his termination.
Blackburn added that he would be able to prove that the claims were not time-barred, as his client reached out to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission well before the statute of limitations expired, and that Jones worked out of the New York office and alongside New York partners.
|Read More
Fox Rothschild Fires Lawyer Accused of Repeated Sexual Harassment, Assault
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250