Sacramento, California.From California to D.C., These Are the Proposals for Reforming Law Firm Ownership
Change is in the air as five jurisdictions consider new regulations that could affect the entire industry.
February 24, 2020 at 03:46 PM
2 minute read
In The American Lawyer's March cover story, Dan Packel and Dylan Jackson closely examined the fight to reform the rules around law firm ownership and related issues—and the effect it could have on the industry's many stakeholders as the dominoes begin to fall. These are the jurisdictions whose regulatory reviews could get the ball rolling:
|California
The Task Force on Access Through Innovation of Legal Services is preparing its final report, after an earlier set of recommendations offered both a more modest and a bolder approach to the question of fee-sharing with nonlawyers. If approved by the board of trustees, the proposal would then go to the California Supreme Court.
|Utah
In August 2019, the Utah Supreme Court adopted the recommendations of the Implementation Task Force on Regulatory Reform. One track focuses on loosening restrictions on lawyers, while the other aims to create a new regulatory system focused on services, not just lawyers. The task force is establishing a regulatory sandbox in which innovators can try new approaches and outcomes will be closely observed.
|Arizona
The state's Task Force on the Delivery of Legal Services in October 2019 recommended eliminating the prohibition on partnerships with nonlawyers. A petition to change the rules and implement a new regulatory framework was filed with the Arizona Supreme Court at the end of January, and public comments are due at the end of March. The court is expected to consider the petition in August.
|Illinois
The Chicago Bar Association and the Chicago Bar Foundation announced in October 2019 a task force focused on updating Illinois' rules. They are aiming to have recommendations to the Illinois Supreme Court by the fall.
|Washington, D.C.
The District of Columbia is already the sole jurisdiction in the country to allow some form of nonlawyer ownership. The D.C. Bar Global Legal Practice Committee announced in January it would consider expanding what is permissible. Public comments are due in mid-March, and any recommendations will first go to the bar's board of governors before potential submission to the D.C. Court of Appeals.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute read
Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Combined Class of Partners and Counsel in Firm History
Boies Schiller Increases Federal Clerkship Bonus to $150K Amid Hiring Uptick
MoFo Poaches More Tech Talent From Goodwin With 3-Partner ECVC Group
Trending Stories
- 1What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 2Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 3US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 4‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 53 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
